Community
Young Hunters Specifically for the kids, this is a great place to share experiences and meet other young hunters.

Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-09-2004, 08:52 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Maylene,Alabama
Posts: 283
Default Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

If you guys or girls would rate lord of the Rings The Return of the king. What would your rating be on 1-10. I ask because I havent seen it yet.
Little Bow Man 1 is offline  
Old 01-09-2004, 08:53 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mormonville, Utah!
Posts: 2,753
Default RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

5-the editors got really sloppy on catching all sorts of probs-ask me about it when you've seen it.
j3k2c1 is offline  
Old 01-09-2004, 09:50 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 1,084
Default RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

yah id give it about a 5 as well, not as good as the second one.
young_gun is offline  
Old 01-09-2004, 10:05 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
PAhunter86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 3,240
Default RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

5?!?! Ya'll are nuts

9.5
PAhunter86 is offline  
Old 01-09-2004, 10:35 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 1,084
Default RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

PA, it wasnt nearly as good as the second or first ones were!especially when they brought the cave dweller people in
young_gun is offline  
Old 01-09-2004, 11:03 PM
  #6  
Giant Nontypical
 
Red Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,440
Default RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

I havent seen it so dont say too much guys lol[]
Red Hawk is offline  
Old 01-10-2004, 07:49 AM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location:
Posts: 116
Default RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

Lord of the Rings: Return of the King was better than the second one. The first wasn't as good as the other ones. I would give it an 8 or a 9.5
smoothsteve is offline  
Old 01-10-2004, 07:53 AM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location:
Posts: 338
Default RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

i would give it a 9.5 because they missed a lot of important stuff
take-em is offline  
Old 01-10-2004, 09:52 AM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mormonville, Utah!
Posts: 2,753
Default RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

If you look at how TERRIBLE the editors did their job you would have to knock it down to a 6-7. Then plug into the equation the fact of how much was not really covered in The Return of the King and you would be forced to knock it down to a 5!
j3k2c1 is offline  
Old 01-10-2004, 08:35 PM
  #10  
Nontypical Buck
 
PAhunter86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 3,240
Default RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10

5??? I'd like to see you do a better job![8D] They couldn't cover a whole lot because those books are so long. If they did cover it all, you'd still give it a 5 because you'd be sore from sitting in the theater for 6 hours!
PAhunter86 is offline  


Quick Reply: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.