Rate Lord of Rings 1-10
#23
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location:
Posts: 128
RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10
ORIGINAL: shotgunman 410
i would like to know why r u talking about Lotr ona hunting sight when theres notheing to do with hunting execpt bows and arrows & besides there is no hunting envoled what-so-ever in it
i would like to know why r u talking about Lotr ona hunting sight when theres notheing to do with hunting execpt bows and arrows & besides there is no hunting envoled what-so-ever in it
#24
RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10
i would like to know why r u talking about Lotr ona hunting sight when theres notheing to do with hunting execpt bows and arrows & besides there is no hunting envoled what-so-ever in it
#26
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 622
RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10
I would say about a 7 because it didnt do very well relating to the book. And the end was stupid. They didnt even have The Gray Havens! I cant believe they one all those award at the oscars[:'(]
#28
RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10
I give it a 1... I don't really like the movies, I can't sit through movies that long that don't have some major action going on early on, and for some reason I just couldn't get into these ones. I've read the books and those were ok, but I just couldn't get into the movies.
#29
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 15
RE: Rate Lord of Rings 1-10
i give it a ten for all the movies... i think the people that hand out awards know a little more than what some of you think about the editing... and for those who don't care about the movie or haven't even seen it.. shut your trap.