Topgun 3006

Put up ten more if you'd like because I said I wasn't going to get in a pissing match over a friggin rack's score, LOL! If I'm wrong on that other one hitting 150" it's no big deal, as I've mentioned in several posts that an inch here or there makes a big difference in final score. It's amazing how you can say those other three deer you posted score better than the one the OP put up when he hasn't had it scored yet, but maybe you're a clairvoyant!

snapper1982

you got in a ping match as soon as you kept talking. and unless that deer has 5 inch mass and 25 inch beams i stand by my 138.

Topgun 3006

He just might, but in case you haven't noticed, all of your posts except the last one have been removed from this thread!!!

fritz1

Id say 130-140 at the most, I have several 150" class bucks and a 200+" whitetail, this one is not in a 150" class. Look at the length of his ears, a whitetails ears are about 6.5" long, now look at his tines compared to his ears. He is maybe 15" wide, again ear tip to ear tip on a whitetail is about 16", he isnt wider than his ears. His eyegaurds hurt him and he doesnt have enough mass or main beams. The short back tine on the deers right side is going to hurt him as well. I would lean more to a 135 but no more than a 140, before deductions. Nice buck though!!! A shooter for sure, no matter where you are from!!

skinnnner

I agree.iv shot several bucks that scored 150 and up and this buck wont make 150.

browtine7

No it does not.

Topgun 3006

Thanks skinnnner, as I think that's the 4th or 5th time you've told us that on this thread, LOL!

skinnnner

No it doesnt.but it does mean he has experiance when judgeing deer.

skinnnner

Ill admit judgeing deer can be diffacult,a 300pound deer can make a 140 class rack look small where as a 120 pound deer can make a 140 class rack look big.

jepcho

Most of us seem to agree, I say 135 to 140ish.