Baiting ticket?
03-03-2009, 04:03 AM
#12
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cove City, North Carolina
Posts: 256
RE: Baiting ticket?
game warden or not, law or not, he was on private property, and if the guy didn't invite him there he shouldn't have been there. as far as the ticke goes, he must have been trying to meet his quota, complete b.s.
03-03-2009, 05:11 AM
#14
Boone & Crockett
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ponce de Leon Florida USA
Posts: 10,079
RE: Baiting ticket?
In Alabama as well as Florida, a game warden has more leeway than any other officer of the law. They do not require a search warrant,as long as they have probable cause, and that is a very broad discretion. In Florida the usage of game wardens on drug investigations is common.
03-03-2009, 06:56 AM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 111
RE: Baiting ticket?
What a dumb excuse for a game warden!He knew better.We have some of those here in MS,but we also have some that know the difference between baiting and something as inoccent as eating a few pecans.I guess there's one (or more) in every crowd.
03-03-2009, 07:19 AM
#16
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Louisiana
Posts: 3,050
RE: Baiting ticket?
Some of you are saying probable cause. Is eating pecans on your way to a stand probable cause? Why was he even coming on the property?The GW should not have even been on the property, unless there has been illegal activity going on. This case is rediculous. I would have definately fought it. I probably would have spoken my mind about the situation to the GW. That probably wouldn't have helped my case, but it would have mademe feel better.At least I don't have to worry about this happening in LA. Baiting deer is perfectly legal.
03-03-2009, 07:46 AM
#17
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southwest Ohio
Posts: 10,277
RE: Baiting ticket?
Strutter,
My understanding is that if they know that any type of hunting activity is occurring on the property, then that provides probably cause toenter the property to check for potential illegal activity.
My understanding is that if they know that any type of hunting activity is occurring on the property, then that provides probably cause toenter the property to check for potential illegal activity.
03-03-2009, 08:03 AM
#18
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 54
RE: Baiting ticket?
Even though the ticket is pure BS.I believe the Game Waden has every right to be on private land, unless the land is high fence and has only been stocked with game animals that you have purcased then the wildlife belongs to the State. If the Game Department does not utilize Game check stations then what other method do they haveat their disposal to ensure regulations are being followed? If you are obeying the laws, then what harm is there in them being on your property?
03-03-2009, 08:13 AM
#19
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southwest Ohio
Posts: 10,277
RE: Baiting ticket?
Bobcats,
Its a question of priorities and common sense. Just about every state has a significant amount of public land that the GW's could be patrolling. Also, at least in my experience, road hunters account for a disproportionate amount of poaching. GW's are supposed to be stretched thin, so why not concentrate there efforts in those areas rather than wondering what Billy Bob is doing on his back 40. Its also pretty stupid to go creeping around on private property dressed in green when people are trying to hunt. I dont really buy the assertion that GW's should have the power to go where the wild game is located. Based on that logic, they can walk right into my house because they saw a squirrel crawl down my chimney.[
]
Since a high fenced operation has other game on it besides deer, whose movement is not restricted, then I dunno why they don't have jurisdiction there as well.
Its a question of priorities and common sense. Just about every state has a significant amount of public land that the GW's could be patrolling. Also, at least in my experience, road hunters account for a disproportionate amount of poaching. GW's are supposed to be stretched thin, so why not concentrate there efforts in those areas rather than wondering what Billy Bob is doing on his back 40. Its also pretty stupid to go creeping around on private property dressed in green when people are trying to hunt. I dont really buy the assertion that GW's should have the power to go where the wild game is located. Based on that logic, they can walk right into my house because they saw a squirrel crawl down my chimney.[
]Since a high fenced operation has other game on it besides deer, whose movement is not restricted, then I dunno why they don't have jurisdiction there as well.