License fees
#12
RE: License fees
I think I would be more prepared to accept a hunter host system if it meant increased access to the hunting that is available. I'm not saying i'd expect equal access to draw tags but perhaps a small percentage of allocations in each zone could be made available to non resident canadianson an annual basis. Something similar to alberta's system where the non resident would have to apply with a resident and would only get drawn if the resident does too. Maybe another option in the case of general tags would be to make the seasons more accessible (ie. same dates as for residents) along with the addition of a host system. It would be interesting to dig up how much revenue SERM generates through non-res tags.
#13
RE: License fees
ORIGINAL: Saskabush
Skeeter and Hia, we've discussed this before so I know where you both stand on non resident season and why. My question is how would you feel about a hunter host system for canadians with increased access to other species as well as partial access to the limited entry system (draws)? Given that sask residents currently enjoy sole access to the fantastic muledeer and elk hunting, would you be prepared to sharein a systemthat wouldbe more controlled from an access point of view?
Skeeter and Hia, we've discussed this before so I know where you both stand on non resident season and why. My question is how would you feel about a hunter host system for canadians with increased access to other species as well as partial access to the limited entry system (draws)? Given that sask residents currently enjoy sole access to the fantastic muledeer and elk hunting, would you be prepared to sharein a systemthat wouldbe more controlled from an access point of view?
As far as limited entry draws only if they apply with a resident acting asa hunter hostand have the same preference points. It should also be limited to a set amount of tags so residents have a greater opportunity and to protect against over harvest.
I think anything but the current system would be welcomed by the majority of resident hunters. We aren't greedy but we sure would like to see something that would act as a limit to those pursuing game within our borders.
I have a vex about gurus coming here to video harvests and profit off them by the free for all we have in place. To me it is not fair and should be dealt with no/if's/and's or buts! Call it greed if you want but I am sick of being told MR. X has just taken away another piece of property menawhile raking huge dollars off his outfitting allotment. I fear I have said to much so I will de-rail the train at this point!!
Red Lion, consumable products vs natural resources. Apples to oranges in my opinion. I understand you reasons but I don't think it unfair to request a premium to hunt lands other then where your tax dollars go. Jsut my perspective of course.