Cuddeback 3.0
03-20-2006, 09:01 PM
#11
Fork Horn
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 381
RE: Cuddeback 3.0
I have tested and reveiwed the Cuddeback 3.0 and you can find the review at the website listed below if you are interested.
Digital vs 35mm. I'll go digital all the way. Pay for a good one with a memory card and rechargeable batteries and you will get thousands of pictures each year with no more expense. If you only want to take 48 or so pictures each year then the 35mm makes sense. Not everyone wants to take thousands of pictures each year but if you would do that with a 35mm, the film and processing would get pretty expensive.
Digital vs 35mm. I'll go digital all the way. Pay for a good one with a memory card and rechargeable batteries and you will get thousands of pictures each year with no more expense. If you only want to take 48 or so pictures each year then the 35mm makes sense. Not everyone wants to take thousands of pictures each year but if you would do that with a 35mm, the film and processing would get pretty expensive.
03-29-2006, 06:08 PM
#12
Fork Horn
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 287
RE: Cuddeback 3.0
I tried the Cuddeback and returned it to the store. It's somewhat complicated and I wanted to remove the camera. I bought a Trail Ghost P41LE and couldn't be happier. It has a higher megapixel rating than the Cuddeback and the camera can be removed and used independantly, which my wife likes. www.trailghost.com
Another good camera is the Penns woods 4.1 model. They also sell a really nice Infrared one. www.pennswoods.com
Good Luck!!
Another good camera is the Penns woods 4.1 model. They also sell a really nice Infrared one. www.pennswoods.com
Good Luck!!
04-10-2006, 12:35 AM
#13
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kali-fornya via Mizzurah
Posts: 131
RE: Cuddeback 3.0
theres some reviews on jesses that might help http://www.jesseshunting.com/reviewp...at.php/cat/226
