moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
02-13-2008, 10:10 PM
#1
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey rep
Posts: 259
moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
Ok guys and gals lets see your average quality pic from the moultrie D-40. I have a few 3.1's but have never tried a D-40. For you guys that have tried them both, what are the overall differences in photo quality and trigger speed?
02-14-2008, 08:02 AM
#3
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,062
RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
I have the Moultrie D40, and I love it so far. Batteries could last longer, but other than that, for the $$, it is a great camera. The only other camera I have had is a 35mm Stealth. I will post some pics from it tonight when I get home from work. Like someone told me before, every camera has its good points, and bad points, but the bottom line is, buy what you can afford, and hae fun with it. I for one, refuse to go out and spend $300 on a camera that is going to be outside on a tree all the time.
02-14-2008, 11:48 AM
#5
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chatham, Ohio
Posts: 8,834
RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
ORIGINAL: heavy hitter
picture quality isn't good for either, and unless you set it over a bait pile you won't get pictures cause it triggers sooooo slow. customer service is excellent though.
picture quality isn't good for either, and unless you set it over a bait pile you won't get pictures cause it triggers sooooo slow. customer service is excellent though.
02-14-2008, 02:25 PM
#6
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: illinois
Posts: 395
RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
cuddes are horrible. moultries are the greatest cameras ever made. the picture quality is incredible and the batteries will last for years. heck i've taken 10,000 pictures with my d40 and the battery life still says 85%. plus, their customer service is second to none.
02-14-2008, 05:56 PM
#8
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 2,089
RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
ORIGINAL: heavy hitter
cuddes are horrible. moultries are the greatest cameras ever made. the picture quality is incredible and the batteries will last for years. heck i've taken 10,000 pictures with my d40 and the battery life still says 85%. plus, their customer service is second to none.
cuddes are horrible. moultries are the greatest cameras ever made. the picture quality is incredible and the batteries will last for years. heck i've taken 10,000 pictures with my d40 and the battery life still says 85%. plus, their customer service is second to none.
02-14-2008, 09:43 PM
#9
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chatham, Ohio
Posts: 8,834
RE: moultrie D-40 vs. 3.1
ORIGINAL: heavy hitter
cuddes are horrible. moultries are the greatest cameras ever made. the picture quality is incredible and the batteries will last for years. heck i've taken 10,000 pictures with my d40 and the battery life still says 85%. plus, their customer service is second to none.
cuddes are horrible. moultries are the greatest cameras ever made. the picture quality is incredible and the batteries will last for years. heck i've taken 10,000 pictures with my d40 and the battery life still says 85%. plus, their customer service is second to none.
