trophy taker v.s. zero effect
01-16-2004, 02:19 PM
#11
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oh USA
Posts: 1,584
RE: trophy taker v.s. zero effect
I've just started fiddling with the Trophy Takers. I have a Shakey Hunter and the original. The Shakey is easily the better of the two for hunting, IMO. Both were easy to set up and work great.
01-16-2004, 02:56 PM
#12
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eastern PA USA
Posts: 1,398
RE: trophy taker v.s. zero effect
Phil:
Thought I remember you using the NAP drop aways. How does the Trophy Taker compare, IYO?
I have had both the Trophy Taker and the MZE. Both are great rests, but I still have not seen enough evidence that drop away rests in general really provide better accuracy or forgiveness. The do give you total fletch clearance if you are set up right.
The MZE definitely has the arrow containment advantage over the TT for hunting. I did have the standard TT, not the Shaky though.
Thought I remember you using the NAP drop aways. How does the Trophy Taker compare, IYO?
I have had both the Trophy Taker and the MZE. Both are great rests, but I still have not seen enough evidence that drop away rests in general really provide better accuracy or forgiveness. The do give you total fletch clearance if you are set up right.
The MZE definitely has the arrow containment advantage over the TT for hunting. I did have the standard TT, not the Shaky though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
happyhuntin
Technical
4
03-08-2007 04:20 PM
coelkhntr
Bowhunting Gear Review
12
04-21-2005 04:03 PM
