Hoyt Cam and a half... opinions..
#11
Spike
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 20
RE: Hoyt Cam and a half... opinions..
I went to the Hoyt Ultratec this past January after always being a finger shooter. I am shooting 430 gr arrows at 265 fps. VERY VERY Smooth and VERY VERY Quiet!! I took 6 deer with it in the first 21 days of October. Get crop damage permits etc and 2 buck tags in Michigan and hunt here in ohio. Have never taken a deer past 21 yards till I got this bow. 1 at 28 yards 1 at 26yards and 1 at 25 yards, the rest were closer. I think the 6 deer prove it all for me. Altough I have taken over 50 deer I have never done this well in such a shot time!!
#12
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location:
Posts: 18
RE: Hoyt Cam and a half... opinions..
Oh did I mention wisper quiet.
Corey
#13
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lindstrom, MN U.S.A
Posts: 38
RE: Hoyt Cam and a half... opinions..
Thanks again all, I love these opinions from the people that have shot them. Although you can get the feel of a bow by shooting it a few times at the store you really dont get the feel of the long haul. I would like to hear more from JeramyK about why he feels the bow isn' t for him. Just to hear his opinion. And like nmaineron I too maybe wish it had just another 1/2" of brace. But I did like the handle and I have very large hands. However I have been shooting a small gripped bow for qhite a while now. I shoot a Hoyt Pro(something or other)cant even remember what it is exactly, it was one of thier first machined alum bows.
And as with anybow I know form is very important, if it wasn' t a challenge we wouldn' t be in this sport and we would all be shooting 7MM Mag' s with lazer scopes. I do feel my form is pertty decent or I wouldn' t have shot 11 straight perf. 300 games in a row. However, standing 20 yards broadside to a paper target and 20 yards quatering away while standing 15 feet up a tree are two totally different things.
Thanks again all!!! Love the opinions, keep them comming!
And as with anybow I know form is very important, if it wasn' t a challenge we wouldn' t be in this sport and we would all be shooting 7MM Mag' s with lazer scopes. I do feel my form is pertty decent or I wouldn' t have shot 11 straight perf. 300 games in a row. However, standing 20 yards broadside to a paper target and 20 yards quatering away while standing 15 feet up a tree are two totally different things.
Thanks again all!!! Love the opinions, keep them comming!
#14
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hyrum Ut. USA
Posts: 13
RE: Hoyt Cam and a half... opinions..
I too would suggest an ultratec with your draw. Mine will have its birthday this month and it hasn' t been in a press since the first day when I put in the peep. Factory cables at the factory settings. They stretched for the first couple hundred shots and have settled in ever since. I shot my deer from a treestand in a sitting position with no problems with the length. After all 4" of ATA only equates to 2" on each side of the grip. My ultra has the 2000 limbs.
#15
RE: Hoyt Cam and a half... opinions..
The C.5 is definitely a great cam system. While it may not be “new” it was a needed change for Hoyt , IMO as their cam technology for the past few years had been very lackluster and run of the mill.
It’s smooth to draw, and very accurate. Just make sure if you can, that you purchase a model where your draw length will not be in the either of the two longest draw length positions (e.g. if you have a 30” draw, you would want to get a cam that will max out at 31”) as this is where the nock travel “problems” will tend to show up. Not that it’s a huge deal, just a suggestion if you want the best possible nock travel.
The only thing I think Hoyt really needed to address was recoil. The C.5 has the speed and smoothness, and the bows are super quiet and vibe free but the limb angles they have used still produced some thump, at least compared to other top-end designs such as Mathews Legacy/LX, BowTech Pat SC/ExVFT, etc. This seems to have been focused on with the 2004 models with their more parallel limb angle, and shorter limbs. I’ve shot the new ViperTec and it is very smooth shooting thanks to those new features. In fact, I nearly bought it I was so impressed, but picked up something else instead
It’s smooth to draw, and very accurate. Just make sure if you can, that you purchase a model where your draw length will not be in the either of the two longest draw length positions (e.g. if you have a 30” draw, you would want to get a cam that will max out at 31”) as this is where the nock travel “problems” will tend to show up. Not that it’s a huge deal, just a suggestion if you want the best possible nock travel.
The only thing I think Hoyt really needed to address was recoil. The C.5 has the speed and smoothness, and the bows are super quiet and vibe free but the limb angles they have used still produced some thump, at least compared to other top-end designs such as Mathews Legacy/LX, BowTech Pat SC/ExVFT, etc. This seems to have been focused on with the 2004 models with their more parallel limb angle, and shorter limbs. I’ve shot the new ViperTec and it is very smooth shooting thanks to those new features. In fact, I nearly bought it I was so impressed, but picked up something else instead
#16
RE: Hoyt Cam and a half... opinions..
ORIGINAL: Sport/MN
I would like to hear more from JeramyK about why he feels the bow isn' t for him. Just to hear his opinion.
I would like to hear more from JeramyK about why he feels the bow isn' t for him. Just to hear his opinion.
As I' ve said, I have nothing against the bow. I really like it. However I' ve been spending some " quality" time with my brothers Bowtech and I' m really taking a liking to it. I can shoot it much much longer with no problems whatsoever. It feels more like my old bow. So now I' m looking into the 04' Bowtechs rather than force myself to adjust to the Cybertec.