Straight/Level Nock travel
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CWD Central, WI.
Posts: 2,062
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok. I' ve read the cam.5 problem thread. I' ve read the Archery Talk Who-Ha thread. Lets name some names hear. We don' t need another " is it needed" thread. We need a " who" has it thread. If you don' t want to post your findings, email me with what you know. I' m not affaid to hurt anyones feelings. Even if they' re my own. Or at least the biggies.
Hoyt C.5?
W/Spiral Cams? (is that the 2 hoyt options?)
Bowtech singles?
Bowtech duallies?
Mathews?
Arthur: If you check back up here, I guess I meant the spiral cam.
Hoyt C.5?
W/Spiral Cams? (is that the 2 hoyt options?)
Bowtech singles?
Bowtech duallies?
Mathews?
Arthur: If you check back up here, I guess I meant the spiral cam.
#2
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,175
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The only current Hoyt option besides the Cam.5 is the Accuwheel. I don' t know if the Accuwheel has it, but my ProTec shoots better than I do. For sure.
I think the Spiral cam is just a higher performance version of the Cam.5, nub.
I think the Spiral cam is just a higher performance version of the Cam.5, nub.
#4
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Baltimore Maryland USA
Posts: 1,385
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you want to see a comparative study, done with my test equipment, using the same test parameters, stop by my shop. You' d be surprised at the results and the lack of truthful advertising.
Other than that, I won' t get into this subject.
Other than that, I won' t get into this subject.
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#5
Typical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: .. NH USA
Posts: 970
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think that' s a safe way to approach it Len, I' ll side with that also., because no matter what we say someone will get hissy over it. so sometimes we' re better off letting people find out for themselves.![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Besides, this has already been beaten to death.....
Pinwheel 12
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Besides, this has already been beaten to death.....
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#6
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CWD Central, WI.
Posts: 2,062
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I' ll just jump right in my car and drive right over there. CYA in what 20 hours or so. Two of the guys I was hopeing to get a little insite on this topic from, just backed down. Afraid to name names? I believe the only thing thats been beaten to death about this is whether S/L nock travel is needed. You both have convinced some of us it is. Now when we ask for your help, you bail out on us.
#7
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: paragould AR USA
Posts: 259
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have seen some test on the Razor Tech ,MQ1, LX, Darton' s CPS,BowTech VFT & Black Knight........The Darton MQ1 and LX were striaght the Razor Tech was off some and while if BowTech was a little bit more level than they are man they would be smoking fast....I know they are fast but would even be faster.....What does this mean to the average archer? Nothing....So choose what you want and be happy about...Dont get caught up in all this junk
#8
Typical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: .. NH USA
Posts: 970
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nub---Not backing down from anything, just don' t feel the need to get slammed by those who are loyal to certain brands who claim they have S&LNT but do not.
Let me state this---I also have test equipment, and have tested darned near every manufacturers' bow out there that has claimed they have straight and level nock travel in the past few years. Len and I have conversed about a couple over this time period also. To date MY findings have concluded that only TWO bows have true straight and level nock travel, both of them are hybrids, neither of which has a four-letter name.![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
There are also TWO solocam equipped companies that are very, very close, both of which have the same general cam/idler design. (the second one starts with a " K" ) Just a note--the MQ1 did NOT offer S&LNT. Neither did the Q2 or Q2XL.
They have been tested, and so it has been written!
As earlier stated, 2004 will be a very exciting year, with many more companies throwing their hats into the ring also.
And Hawgz---
Let me say that S&LNT will benefit an average archer far more than it will a Pro, simply because it is much more forgiving of arrow spine and human error input. I' d like to know why everyone is a non-believer of everything until it gets pounded into their brain 4000 times? Why is that?[&:][X(]![Big Grin](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Anyway--
There you have " the rest of the story" from my perspective.
Good shooting, Pinwheel 12
Let me state this---I also have test equipment, and have tested darned near every manufacturers' bow out there that has claimed they have straight and level nock travel in the past few years. Len and I have conversed about a couple over this time period also. To date MY findings have concluded that only TWO bows have true straight and level nock travel, both of them are hybrids, neither of which has a four-letter name.
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
There are also TWO solocam equipped companies that are very, very close, both of which have the same general cam/idler design. (the second one starts with a " K" ) Just a note--the MQ1 did NOT offer S&LNT. Neither did the Q2 or Q2XL.
They have been tested, and so it has been written!
![Big Grin](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
And Hawgz---
Let me say that S&LNT will benefit an average archer far more than it will a Pro, simply because it is much more forgiving of arrow spine and human error input. I' d like to know why everyone is a non-believer of everything until it gets pounded into their brain 4000 times? Why is that?[&:][X(]
![Big Grin](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Anyway--
There you have " the rest of the story" from my perspective.
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#9
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: paragould AR USA
Posts: 259
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
PINWHEEL12......You are right about the benefits being greater for the average archer...But what I was trying to say is that I dont think they should get got up in the junk that is going on between the two companies in question....But the MQ1 I seen tested was real close to being level....How far off was the one you tested...If I can ask...
![Big Grin](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#10
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CWD Central, WI.
Posts: 2,062
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is this a non issue with 2 cam bows? Because of tiller and creep tuning? What about a certain short vallied 2 cam?
Took me a while to find the K. That was a few pages back in the archives. The other begins with M?
Thanks for the replies.
Took me a while to find the K. That was a few pages back in the archives. The other begins with M?
Thanks for the replies.