Community
Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

bow head to head

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-26-2009, 04:34 PM
  #1  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
bowhuntn87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 511
Default bow head to head

Ross Cardiac vs. Bowtech S.W.A.T.

Brace Height 7.1257.125
Poundage70 70
A. to A. length34 34
Speed 312322
Letoff 65-80% 65-80%


guys, in a few weeks i'll be purchasing a new bow, and it looks like it'll be tossup between these two. as you can see the difference between the two is pretty negligible. the price of both bows are 650. the speed on the SWAT is just a bit more, but nothing i'll be able to tell the difference with much i don't think. i'll be shooting both of these bows in a couple weeks, but i wanted to get some feedback on here as well.
just wondering if anyone has shot these bows, and how draw cycles are as compared to other bows, as well as hand shock, forgiveness, ect. ect. the main difference between the two is that the bowtech is a binary cam system and the ross is a single cam. right now i have a single cam, but i was wondering if someone could explain the benefits and drawbacks of each type? i have never shot a binary cam before... was wonderinghow they compete with the single cam....
bowhuntn87 is offline  
Old 01-28-2009, 01:02 PM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
JeffB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 3,058
Default RE: bow head to head

I have not shot either of them, but there are a whole mess of BT guys around here who could prolly give ya some insight.

In general, any hybrid (binary) cam bow will have better nock travel and speed (assuming a similar amount of stored energy- there are exceptions as regards to nock travel-Mathews bows generally have extremely good nock travel.

Some people find the Hybrids draw smoother, but IDK- I think it's really dependant on the design of each individual cam. I've drawn some really hard binary/hybrids, and some smooth ones. Same with singles. Single cams are still a bit more maintenance free/easy to set up- with todays great strings and cables after you get a hundred or so shots on the bow you set the cam rotation. On the one cam it easy peasy and then you can basically forget about it. Binarys/Hybrids require a little more tinkering initially to get both cams in proper position. If you have a good pro-shop, they should take care of this for you. Bottom line- very little maintenance required after string/cable(s) are shot in for either system.

Personally having quite a bit of experience with hybrids/cps and now having some binaries, I still think I prefer a single cam- they hold better for me, have a bit less thump/recoil,and noise. But the differences are not huge assuming a top end single and a top end hybrid- Pick whichever bow feels best to YOU, and don't sweat the details of the cam designs
JeffB is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 07:06 PM
  #3  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
bowhuntn87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 511
Default RE: bow head to head

thanks jeff, also i was wondering, is there any difference in tendency to have cam lean? do the binary cams lean any more than the solo cams do?
bowhuntn87 is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 08:36 PM
  #4  
Giant Nontypical
 
MeanV2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 7,367
Default RE: bow head to head

The Best thing to do is shoot the bows and then buy what feels best to you. The Cardiac is going to be smoother, but that's understandable since it's also slower.

The Binary cams are as easy to tune as a single cam and they will stay in tune as well maybe even better than a single cam.

Throw a Ross Carnivore (it has a hybrid Cam system)in there and shoot it as well. I have the Ross Carnivore 34and it has done nothing but impress me. I killed 2 Fall Merriam Gobblers with it at 20 degrees below zero.It shot spot on and gave me No trouble even at those extreme temps.

Good luck!! Have Fun choosing

Dan
MeanV2 is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 06:02 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
JeffB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 3,058
Default RE: bow head to head

ORIGINAL: bowhuntn87

thanks jeff, also i was wondering, is there any difference in tendency to have cam lean? do the binary cams lean any more than the solo cams do?
I'm not nearly familiar enough with the BT Binary cams- other than having shot the newer models.I did not notice any lean on the CP riser bows I messed with. I have seen some people( here and on AT) talk about lean being an "issue" with BowTech at some point in time. I can only say for sure there is no lean on my GT-500 and the new Bowtech CP risered bows I shot.




JeffB is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 06:24 AM
  #6  
Boone & Crockett
 
PABowhntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lehigh County PA USA
Posts: 12,157
Default RE: bow head to head

Jeff,

It has been my experience that cam lean is not an issue with any of the CP style bows. Even the non-CP riser model Binary Cam bows do not display significant cam lean at this point. When the binary cam originally debuted there were a few cam lean issues but not to the point where it significantly affected accuracy or the general shooting experience....at least not with what I utilized at the time. Bowtech has since incorporated several design changes to help alleviate any past issues.

Bowhunt,

In all honesty I have not handled either of the two models in question. From a practical perspective it is going to come down to which "fits" you better in terms of your preferences for draw cycle, shot feel, etc... I think you could be happy with either considering their construction and performance. However, like Dan and not knowing how you came to decide on just those two modelsI feel the need to suggest some of the other models as well. My two "favorites" up to this point are the Diamond Black Ice and the Ross Carnivore 31. I think they are my favorites simply because they combine such perfect specs (for me) in certain areas. I find the length, weight and overall balance of each bow to be ideally suited for the bowhunting situations I put them into. They aren't too light, too heavy, too long, etc...

In addition, and probably the most importantly in my book, I love the draw cycle of each bow. As was mentioned recently in another thread there is a very gradually transition from the start of the draw cycle up to peak weight and then down into the valley. It all seems very natural and it is very reproducable in hunting situations. I think that is probably the biggest selling point to me...the fact that each bow is so easy to use in the actual hunting environment. That draw cycle is critical because the last thing you would want is to make alot of movement or, heaven forbid, actually not be able to draw the bow at the moment of truth.

Lastly, though neither bow is a "barn burner" I think both produce more than satisfactory levels of speed and would probably fall right into the middle of the two bows you have listed above.

Hope this helps somewhat.
PABowhntr is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 06:50 AM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
muzzyman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central PA
Posts: 2,299
Default RE: bow head to head

I can't say about the Cardiac, but I did get to handle and shoot the SWAT. It's a nice bow. Very stable and plenty quick enough. One thing that sticks out for me with this bow is the smooth draw cycle. It simply felt good to draw compared to the other new Bowtech's I shot.

The Cardiac seems to be getting great reviews and I'd bet these bows will be very close. Best thing to do is shoot them both, side by side and decide for yourself which you like better.
muzzyman88 is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 07:04 AM
  #8  
Nontypical Buck
 
JeffB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 3,058
Default RE: bow head to head

ORIGINAL: PABowhntr

Jeff,

It has been my experience that cam lean is not an issue with any of the CP style bows. Even the non-CP riser model Binary Cam bows do not display significant cam lean at this point. When the binary cam originally debuted there were a few cam lean issues but not to the point where it significantly affected accuracy or the general shooting experience....at least not with what I utilized at the time. Bowtech has since incorporated several design changes to help alleviate any past issues.
I figured as much. Hence why I put "issue" in quotes in my post. As we both know, most "issues" are blown way out of proportion. I saw no lean at all in the CP riser bows nor did I notice any on the SWAT model.
JeffB is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 08:22 AM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
muzzyman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central PA
Posts: 2,299
Default RE: bow head to head

I defintely have lean in my Allegiance. So much that for whatever reason, it seems to lean the arrows right where I aim.
muzzyman88 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dubbya
Bowhunting
39
04-01-2008 05:08 PM
TexasOaks
Bowhunting
11
06-19-2007 12:58 PM
Wolf killer
Technical
22
02-06-2006 01:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: bow head to head


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.