Front of Center
#11
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kodiak, AK
Posts: 2,877
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: brucelanthier
If bow and arrow are set up correctly I doubt a high FOC will help produce better groups. It is my understanding that the high FOC makes the arrow flighta little more forgiving in poor conditions and really helps with penetration. I know that, from my own experience, my 17% FOC arrows would definitely out penetrate my targets compared to arrows that I have at around 11-12% FOC. I set my deer arrows up with a high FOC for the better penetration it is supposed to provide.
ORIGINAL: KodiakArcher
They have always grouped fine at that FOC but I've never tried anything radical to get more and see if they get better.
They have always grouped fine at that FOC but I've never tried anything radical to get more and see if they get better.
#12
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Balt, MD (orig: J-town,PA) The bowels of Hell!!!
Posts: 2,188
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Weight forward will out penetrate and arrow with the weight more distributed. How much that matters on deer sized game with how high the momentum is on most bows today is debatable. With most of the mass near the front of the arrow you will not have the arrow flexing as much upon impact and therefore maintaining forward momentum more efficiently.
With the weight near the back it will force the shaft to flex upon impact and youwill loose momentum.
With the weight near the back it will force the shaft to flex upon impact and youwill loose momentum.
#13
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: KodiakArcher
But is that from the high FOC or from a higher total weight? If the two arrows are hitting equally square I can't see how a high FOC is going to make a difference in penetration between two shafts of the same weight. The higher FOC arrow would however have a tendency to hit more square in most circumstances (meaning the imperfect world) since the fletching has better leverage on the tip to keep it in a straight trajectory, and would therefore penetrate better.
ORIGINAL: brucelanthier
If bow and arrow are set up correctly I doubt a high FOC will help produce better groups. It is my understanding that the high FOC makes the arrow flighta little more forgiving in poor conditions and really helps with penetration. I know that, from my own experience, my 17% FOC arrows would definitely out penetrate my targets compared to arrows that I have at around 11-12% FOC. I set my deer arrows up with a high FOC for the better penetration it is supposed to provide.
ORIGINAL: KodiakArcher
They have always grouped fine at that FOC but I've never tried anything radical to get more and see if they get better.
They have always grouped fine at that FOC but I've never tried anything radical to get more and see if they get better.
#14
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: davepjr71
Weight forward will out penetrate and arrow with the weight more distributed. How much that matters on deer sized game with how high the momentum is on most bows today is debatable. With most of the mass near the front of the arrow you will not have the arrow flexing as much upon impact and therefore maintaining forward momentum more efficiently.
With the weight near the back it will force the shaft to flex upon impact and youwill loose momentum.
Weight forward will out penetrate and arrow with the weight more distributed. How much that matters on deer sized game with how high the momentum is on most bows today is debatable. With most of the mass near the front of the arrow you will not have the arrow flexing as much upon impact and therefore maintaining forward momentum more efficiently.
With the weight near the back it will force the shaft to flex upon impact and youwill loose momentum.
This spring I am going to set up one arrow to shoot at 53lbs DW. the arrow will have 15.3%FOC and weigh 356grs. It will still be going pretty fast but IMO the higher FOC will be a benefit with the lighter arrow.
One of the things I have come to love about archery/bowhunting is that there is room for many, many well thought out variations of accomplishing the same thing, taking game with bow and arrow.
#15
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Balt, MD (orig: J-town,PA) The bowels of Hell!!!
Posts: 2,188
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
bruce,
I agree with you. I should have stated a minimum DW when making my post. Lower DW's would benefit from the increased FOC.
I'd like to thank whoever told me about the Arrow Dynamics Nitro Stingers. I purchased the "Gold" model which is 8.9 gpi and my total arrow is 437 gr. They are an easy$85 way of increasing the FOC with standard BH's. My FOC went from 12.3 or so to 14.5% just by switching to these arrows and no change in arrow weight from the GT XT Hunters.
I agree with you. I should have stated a minimum DW when making my post. Lower DW's would benefit from the increased FOC.
I'd like to thank whoever told me about the Arrow Dynamics Nitro Stingers. I purchased the "Gold" model which is 8.9 gpi and my total arrow is 437 gr. They are an easy$85 way of increasing the FOC with standard BH's. My FOC went from 12.3 or so to 14.5% just by switching to these arrows and no change in arrow weight from the GT XT Hunters.
#16
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You guys are sort of on the right track![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
You are not going to see a great big difference going from 12% to 15% FOC.
You wont see any real big difference till you get the FOC to 19% and above.
ArthurP, Straightarrow and myself got jumped all over here not so long ago about this very subject.![Big Grin](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
You are not going to see a great big difference going from 12% to 15% FOC.
You wont see any real big difference till you get the FOC to 19% and above.
ArthurP, Straightarrow and myself got jumped all over here not so long ago about this very subject.
![Big Grin](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#17
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Balt, MD (orig: J-town,PA) The bowels of Hell!!!
Posts: 2,188
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think the thing people disagreed with is that if you need to have that high of an FOC and such and so forth with today's equipment.Not about the benefits of very high FOC for slow bows.
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#19
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Balt, MD (orig: J-town,PA) The bowels of Hell!!!
Posts: 2,188
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'veseen very little deviation from my aim point in high winds with12.3% FOC.During this winter I've shot out to 120 yds in high winds and gusting winds (20+mph in an open field). The only issueI had out pastmy bottom pin's range was judging holdover.I did not see any arrow drift.
I understand the physics of what you are saying very clearly and respect that. I've just seen no reason to try it.
I understand the physics of what you are saying very clearly and respect that. I've just seen no reason to try it.
#20
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,175
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't doubt you don't see dramatic benefits at 12.3%. That is just barely nudging it's noseto the top of 'standard' FOC range. You aren't high FOC until you get into 13-18% range. 19% and over is where you get into extreme FOC, and that's where penetration potential really takes off.