2 Blade vs. 3 Blade
#11
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 447
RE: 2 Blade vs. 3 Blade
ORIGINAL: Ausie-guy
Why blame the broad head when you made 2 bad shots?
You still had an arrow left you should have used that one to put the deer down for good.
I have taken a lot of big game animals with 2 blade broad heads including a 2000lb Asian Water Buffalo, put the arrow where it needs to go and it will do the job.
i shot a deer a few years back using a muzzy two blade and hit back near the rear leg and messed her up so she couldnt run then i shot her again in the ribs slight 1/4 too me but i wanted to put another one in her and the deer layed down and i sat and watched it for about ten minutes looked like it was gonna die and i only had one arrow left in my quiver
You still had an arrow left you should have used that one to put the deer down for good.
I have taken a lot of big game animals with 2 blade broad heads including a 2000lb Asian Water Buffalo, put the arrow where it needs to go and it will do the job.
#12
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,413
RE: 2 Blade vs. 3 Blade
im not saying they were good shots just should have been a dead deer and ive taken enough to know that it shouldnt have survived.
I suppose any broadhead is suseptible to a possible defect, however one of the other senerios is far more likely to have been the cause. The fact that the arrows were sticking out of the deer, suggest penetration was not good. Penetration is one of the advantages of two-blade designs, which suggests that the arrow had one of the above mentioned problems (of course I'm assuming the hit was good like you said).
#14
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 447
RE: 2 Blade vs. 3 Blade
like i said before i dont doubt that they work great most of the time but with todays heads why take the chance unless you have low KE. with my situation i stongly believe more cutting surface would have helped and i should have noted that the second shot was sticking out the other side of the deer the fletch was holding it in. i think they penetrate awsome i think my first shot went into the opposite rear leg on its way out and thats why i didnt pass through but with my second shot placement (likely one lung liver cause of quartering shot) i think with two arrows in it it should have dided within the time i gave it and if not died withing a 1/2 mile. just my situation i know tons of people have had deer go two feet and fall over but poor shots will happen once in awhile and i think that is where there is an advantage to more cutting surface. my recurve heads have two little bleeders that really cant soak up too much energy but will help cut that x shape in the hide and tissue.
#15
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Spring Grove, Pa. USA
Posts: 2,120
RE: 2 Blade vs. 3 Blade
I've been using 2-bl heads for years and killed alot of deer with them.Every one I tagged,I watched or heard it crash within 80yds.I've gone thru shoulder blades,busted ribs going in and out and always had decent blood on the ground
#16
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,413
RE: 2 Blade vs. 3 Blade
poor shots will happen once in awhile and i think that is where there is an advantage to more cutting surface.
I have never heard of a person hitting a vital with a 2 blade design and complain that it didn't kill the animal. If they have a problem they usually complain about a poor blood trail. Myself, I'm very good at trailing, so I usually opt for the other advantages the 2-blade design give me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redneck buck hunter
Bowhunting
15
05-25-2008 08:28 PM
HuntingEd
Bowhunting Gear Review
9
08-09-2005 02:38 PM