Community
Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

Consistent Spine or Straightness for best groups

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-25-2002, 05:54 PM
  #31  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Default RE: Consistent Spine or Straightness for best groups

Thanks guys! That does make sense.

Couple questions though , how much added weight does it add? How does FOC change with this setup? And if I'm figuring this correctly , wouldn't the added weight to the fletching end of a carbon arrow strengthen the spine slightly?

I'll give you my setup.

Beman ICS Hunter 340's at 29" with 3-4" fletchings and 100gn tip.
I am on the heavy side as far as spine goes , but I've found that the 340's paper tune bullet holes with far less tinkering than the 400's.

Edited by - bowfanatic on 10/25/2002 22:09:35
BOWFANATIC is offline  
Old 10-25-2002, 06:04 PM
  #32  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Default RE: Consistent Spine or Straightness for best groups

BTW Rangeball , you got your stuff together man!<img src=icon_smile_approve.gif border=0 align=middle>
I've seen you repeatedly ask more intelligent technical questions than anyone here. Not only are you absorbing all of this excellent information , your allowing others to learn as well with the type of questions you ask. I thought I already knew all there was to learn before I came here.
<img src=icon_smile_blush.gif border=0 align=middle> What I have learned is you can learn something new everyday!
Keep it up!

&quot;Nocked,cocked & ready to rock&quot;
BOWFANATIC is offline  
Old 10-25-2002, 07:49 PM
  #33  
Nontypical Buck
 
BGfisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Middletown PA United States
Posts: 3,625
Default RE: Consistent Spine or Straightness for best groups

Jeff, tinkering is the fun part of archery for me. And I do concur about the 3-60 inserts in IC shafts. One of the resons I chose to go back to ACC's was because of the nock-end of the IC shafts splitting when I hit a nock, or as you said, from even a hard frontal impact. Besides, I just think the quality and consistency is better in the ACC's. Nothing technical here. Just the results I get downrange. And I always figure, why be shooting $1000 worth of bow and accessories and junk arrows.

BGfisher is offline  
Old 10-25-2002, 08:35 PM
  #34  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Baltimore Maryland USA
Posts: 1,385
Default RE: Consistent Spine or Straightness for best groups

On some of the earlier wrapped carbon shafts the ends would split even without hitting them with another arrow. We also found that some brands would bend and hold a bend quite easily. By epoxying the metal nock adapters into the nock end, the bending and memory was controlled moreso.

Len in Maryland is offline  
Old 10-25-2002, 10:23 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,585
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Old 10-26-2002, 12:43 AM
  #36  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Default RE: Consistent Spine or Straightness for best groups

Wow , I was thinking maybe an extra 10-15gns<img src=icon_smile_blush.gif border=0 align=middle> That shouldn't make a bit of difference then. What you guys are saying makes total sense and even supports my concerns. The ICS hunter 340 is the first carbon arrow I ever robin hooded that actually went into the other shaft and stayed connected (much like the alluminum robin hoods). And I've also had to replace the nocks on them very often. They would wear so bad that when I'd draw the bow the nock would stay on the string while my arrow fell to the floor.

Thanks guys!
BOWFANATIC is offline  
Old 10-28-2002, 07:59 AM
  #37  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,994
Default RE: Consistent Spine or Straightness for best groups

Bowfanatic, thanks for the kind words

This forum is amazing, and I hope these guys never get tired of answering my stupid questions



Rangeball is offline  
Old 10-28-2002, 08:04 AM
  #38  
Nontypical Buck
 
BGfisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Middletown PA United States
Posts: 3,625
Default RE: Consistent Spine or Straightness for best groups

Rangeball, you're only stupid if you don't ask it. That's how we all gain knowledge from each other.

BGfisher is offline  
Old 10-28-2002, 08:35 AM
  #39  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cincinnati oh USA
Posts: 626
Default RE: Consistent Spine or Straightness for best groups

I think spine & weight have a lot of bearing on good groups. I think straightness you can play with a little but the spine & weight are important.

moonge is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NY Bowhunter
Bowhunting
7
08-02-2008 07:49 AM
buckeye
Bowhunting
26
04-17-2008 01:12 PM
sky_guy_61
Bowhunting
10
09-11-2005 03:52 PM
Stone Cold
Black Powder
9
07-18-2005 08:03 AM
springgobbler
Technical
11
07-07-2005 09:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Consistent Spine or Straightness for best groups


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.