Community
Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

GT 5575 v 7595

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-18-2002, 11:39 AM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,994
Default GT 5575 v 7595

Ok. I am shooting a Diamond hornet, 70# with a 28" draw. I use a drop away rest. I "built" an arrow at Jackson's archery page, and using a 7595, a 100 grain tip, GT insert, 3 4" feathers and a GT lock nock, I get 385 grains, which is the equivalent of 6 grains per pound for my draw length. Seems to be perfect. However, the GT charts say 5575 all the way for my DL and DW. I'm guessing I'd be fine with the 7595s, since I'm using a drop away, correct?

Rangeball is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 11:59 AM
  #2  
Giant Nontypical
 
Kanga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Burleson TX USA
Posts: 6,455
Default RE: GT 5575 v 7595

I use the 5575 28' draw 70# my arrows are only 26" long and are perfect for my set up.

You could be a little stiff in the spine but rather too stiff that too light right.

If they are flying and grouping well then you will be fine

How is your ASAT 3d suit????
Kanga is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 12:00 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oakland City Indiana USA
Posts: 524
Default RE: GT 5575 v 7595

Sounds good. I use that same setup (XT's w/ fletch's) and it works out great. I have the 5575's too and use them for target and 3D where I'm shooting about 10 lbs lighter draw. Sometimes I'll shoot both to see which group better. I have plenty of both because I love Goldtip's<img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>.
ChiefHeadhunter is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 12:07 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,994
Default RE: GT 5575 v 7595

Ausie, it's soaking in sportswash as we speak

Chief, am I correct in my understanding that you are shooting 7595s at 70#, 28&quot; draw length with a drop away rest? If so, no spine related or flight problems, right?

Rangeball is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 12:29 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oakland City Indiana USA
Posts: 524
Default RE: GT 5575 v 7595

Well, it's a bit more confusing than that (and I'm actually at 28 1/2). My hunting bow is at 70 and currently has a biscuit rest on it, but has had a few different ones, one being the Savage that I think you use. Both shafts will give good groups although the stiffer spine has usually given me tighter groups. Let me also say that my hunting setup isn't my most pinpoint accurate setup. Going from one spine to the other without changing my tune will change the point of impact some, but the size difference of my groups usually isn't that great, unless it's my shooting (which is always possible).

I think these shafts are very forgiving as far as spine goes. I came to that conclusion when I bought full length 5575's for my target bow and cut one back an inch or less at a time and maintained a bullet hole through paper at 6 ft. until I reached my cut length. Believe it or not and I was suprised by that.

Have you noticed the new goldtip page where it lists the target shafts? The left column tells you the series 22 is offered in only one spine but can be setup to perform out of almost any bow. I think that kind of backs me up on this (as far as spine goes), and yes I realize it's a different series of shaft.
ChiefHeadhunter is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 05:31 PM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
muzzyman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central PA
Posts: 2,299
Default RE: GT 5575 v 7595

I dont think it would hurt shooting the 7595's. You will will just have to tune the bow to them, which is possible. I experimented with both the 5575's and the 7595's and got them both to shoot well, but for my setup, it liked the 5575's a bit better with broadheads. I am shooting 65lbs with a 28.5&quot; draw and a 27&quot; arrow. I also shoot a 100 gr. Muzzy and this combo has me dead on.

Experiment with both, you should be able to buy a couple of each and see what happens. Only true way of knowing. But I would be willing to bet that the 7595's will shoot good for you. Not to mention you get a little added arrow weight which never hurts the KE department.
muzzyman88 is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 06:24 PM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Default RE: GT 5575 v 7595

I cant speak for a 28&quot; draw , but with my 30&quot; draw 70# , 29&quot; arrow the 5575's paper tune indicated a weak spine , I switched to the 7595's and had bullet holes imediately.

&quot;Nocked,cocked & ready to rock&quot;
BOWFANATIC is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 10:41 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Schofield WI USA
Posts: 47
Default RE: GT 5575 v 7595

I too am shooting the 7595's with Gold Tips G-nock adapters and G-nocks, with 3, 4&quot; feathers and 100 gr. tips, 27 1/2&quot; shafts with 28&quot; draw, @ 65lbs. Total weight is 395 gr. and I'm getting perfect bullet holes with broadheads and field tips shooting identical point of impact. I would definitly go with the 7595's, several people I know shooting 65lbs. had to go up to the 7595's to get perfect bullet holes. Gold Tip needs to recalculate their charts.
Smooch is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
buberwin
Hunting Gear
0
02-23-2008 04:39 PM
deftoswi
Technical
2
03-26-2007 04:06 AM
zac76156
Technical
3
08-19-2005 01:06 PM
Rick James
Archery Gear
0
02-02-2005 07:19 PM
Rack-attack
Technical
1
01-14-2003 10:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: GT 5575 v 7595


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.