Trajectory table help
#2
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Trajectory table help
http://www.eskimo.com/~jbm/calculations/traj/traj.html
Be aware that different companies use different calculations to arrive at their ballistic co-efficients.Also be aware that these calculated trajectories may not represent the actual trajectories produced in your rifle.I have compared the actual trajectories in my rifles to tables and calculated trajectories,and in some cases the differences were significant.
Be aware that different companies use different calculations to arrive at their ballistic co-efficients.Also be aware that these calculated trajectories may not represent the actual trajectories produced in your rifle.I have compared the actual trajectories in my rifles to tables and calculated trajectories,and in some cases the differences were significant.
#3
RE: Trajectory table help
Amen to Stubblejumper's warning about "truth in advertising" when it comes to ballistic coefficients. With the two bullets you describe, I would bet that the Scirocco has a slightly higher actual BC than the Barnes. And Sierra . . . . . they are really optimistic.
#5
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 3,516
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HuntinBayou
Guns
48
03-24-2006 04:25 AM