qdm 2004 pics
03-23-2005, 02:08 PM
#15
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: York, PA.
Posts: 1,313
RE: qdm 2004 pics
Bullmoose, awesome bucks!! Thanks for posting the pics. How many years have you been managing your property? Also what branch of qdma do you belong to? I belong to the mason-dixon branch.
BT. I agree with the exception of one of them they look to be in the 2.5-3.5 year age classes.
Bullmoose, did you guys age the buck's you harvested? Pike
BT. I agree with the exception of one of them they look to be in the 2.5-3.5 year age classes.
Bullmoose, did you guys age the buck's you harvested? Pike
03-23-2005, 05:12 PM
#16
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,689
RE: qdm 2004 pics
ORIGINAL: J Pike
Bullmoose, awesome bucks!! Thanks for posting the pics. How many years have you been managing your property? Also what branch of qdma do you belong to? I belong to the mason-dixon branch.
BT. I agree with the exception of one of them they look to be in the 2.5-3.5 year age classes.
Bullmoose, did you guys age the buck's you harvested? Pike
Bullmoose, awesome bucks!! Thanks for posting the pics. How many years have you been managing your property? Also what branch of qdma do you belong to? I belong to the mason-dixon branch.
BT. I agree with the exception of one of them they look to be in the 2.5-3.5 year age classes.
Bullmoose, did you guys age the buck's you harvested? Pike
I started to manage my dads 75 acres in 2002. Each year its been growing. I belong to the Southeast Branch. But thats pretty far from where we have our property. My goal is to get more people involved in Schuylkill county and start our own branch. You belong to the Mason-Dixon Branch so i guess you know Rick Watts. He's a real nice guy. All the deer were aged at 3.5 except the one with the QDM sign in the background. He was only 2.5 and had a 21 inch spread!
03-23-2005, 06:29 PM
#18
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,689
RE: qdm 2004 pics
ORIGINAL: MikeE51848
Those are some very nice deer. But wasn't it the argument that QDM would not work on a statewide basis? It is great that you can manage your small neck of the woods for these terrific bucks, but I don't believe, and never will, that these results can happen statewide, particulary where large tracks of state or public land are concerned.
Those are some very nice deer. But wasn't it the argument that QDM would not work on a statewide basis? It is great that you can manage your small neck of the woods for these terrific bucks, but I don't believe, and never will, that these results can happen statewide, particulary where large tracks of state or public land are concerned.
03-23-2005, 06:58 PM
#19
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,689
RE: qdm 2004 pics
ORIGINAL: Duckmastor2
Then take the words "QDM" out of your thread header. You know other people in your state dont agree with the QDM theory. Putting it in is a slap in the face. You didnt have to put that in. How about "Nice Pics from PA"? That would have been enough. Dont try and play innocent. With "QDM" in the thread title, discussion on QDM is fair game IMO.
I just dont get it. I post these pictures for people to enjoy and then someone posts." But wasn't it the argument that QDM would not work on a statewide basis?"
