Interview with Pa wmu 2A archery shop owner
#11
Alt predicted that by reducing the herd and balancing the b/d ratio would create as he put it in the video- "a more natural breeding ecology." A scenario where increased breeding competition lends toward larger deer (he presumed with better genetics) would win the majority of breeding rights, and contributing to an improving gene pool over the next few years. He was wrong, and recent studies don't even support his theory on older bucks doing all or even most of the breeding. They have found that nearly all age classes of bucks contribute evenly to breeding. Even in balanced b/d ratios. Read the newest issue of D&DH.
Last edited by Screamin Steel; 09-16-2009 at 04:04 AM.
#13
I support AR because it is the only thing saving any deer left in Pa. But Ar by itself will not produce numerous big bucks when the rest of the program has been taken so far off the course of common sense that we now face the option of managing land ourselves or going to another state to have an enjoyable and productive deer hunt.
#14
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio,mid
Posts: 1,275
And with herd reduction, my theory is that bucks spend TWICE the amount of time and energy finding receptive does
#15
And with herd reduction, ESPECIALLY IN AREAS WHERE THE HERD HAS BEEN KNOCKED BACK TO SINGLE DIGITS PSFM AND 12-15DPSFM, my theory is that bucks spend TWICE the amount of time and energy finding receptive does, losing a good deal of weight, which brings them into the winter months with poor fat reserves. Part of the AR theory involved a better breeding ecology to bring bucks into the winter months in better shape thereby allowing more to survive.
#17
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PA.
Posts: 5,195
I identified this buck on my cam as the 1.5 year old that was constantly wandering underneath my tree last year during shooting hours. This year I am only picking up his movement on the cam after dark and did not see him in person yet. I think he is learning the best way to reach 3.5 is to go nocturnal.
i like that way better than going out early in season, i can hunt grouse/pheasants,i dont get wore out as much hunting a buck all those weeks and more chance to see a bigone close then and not as difficult as early part of archery.i also am only one bass fishing early archery and i have ball catching some bass.
#18
The archery shop owner is a very, very un educated deer hunter.
But I do agree with 4ever that if it wasnt for AR. hunting in PA. would be even worse. Pike
But I do agree with 4ever that if it wasnt for AR. hunting in PA. would be even worse. Pike
Last edited by J Pike; 09-14-2009 at 07:53 PM.
#19
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
I agree pike. Having read this guys stuff several times in the past, including him supporting the program years ago, I think it is a combination of him not being intimately familiar with all the details of the deer program as many of us are, and also he isnt the best at getting his thoughts across in words during interviews.
Main reason I posted was to show the hunter dis-satisfaction with the program. Most are more than aware of this, but you always have that same "handful" of damage controllers who try to claim otherwise.
Main reason I posted was to show the hunter dis-satisfaction with the program. Most are more than aware of this, but you always have that same "handful" of damage controllers who try to claim otherwise.
#20
The archery shop owner is a very, very un educated deer hunter.