MORE OF THE SAME PGC BOC NOMINEE?
#63
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
RE: MORE OF THE SAME PGC BOC NOMINEE?
I dont have a clue what you are babbling about now...But guessing you have now pulled your head out (LOL) far enough to look at a map and see what I told you about 70, and now you feel like a bloomin' idiot and are trying to save face. You should be immune to embarrassment after all the times youve made rediculous comments and were shown the "truth" of the matter.... And you had the nerve to laugh at slinsky???? (LOL)
Also, There are several good "points" that have been brought up in this thread.Some of which you never even addressed, others you addressed with complete nonsense. Now back to your usual game when "LOSING". Change the subject to drivel so nonsensical and meaningless it bores people out of even bothering to read the thread, and pile up about 12 long pages of it on top of anything "meaningful". Sorry. Not this time.
Also, There are several good "points" that have been brought up in this thread.Some of which you never even addressed, others you addressed with complete nonsense. Now back to your usual game when "LOSING". Change the subject to drivel so nonsensical and meaningless it bores people out of even bothering to read the thread, and pile up about 12 long pages of it on top of anything "meaningful". Sorry. Not this time.
#64
RE: MORE OF THE SAME PGC BOC NOMINEE?
I dont have a clue what you are babbling about now...
Butwhat YOU ARE doing isEXACTLY what that rediculous little accusation was! (LOL) There are several good "points" that have been brought up in this thread.Some of which you never even addressed, others you addressed with complete nonsense. Now back to your usual game when "LOSING". Change the subject to drivel so nonsensical and meaningless it bores people out of even bothering to read the thread, and pile up about 12 long pages of it on top of anything "meaningful". Sorry. Not this time.
I post the personal experiences from some hunters I know, you simply yell liar. A liar is one who declares something as fact when he knows it's not. Another type of lie (your kind) is to discredit something simply because you dont want it to be true. You have no way of even knowing of these guys experiencesbut that doesnt stop you from calling it a lie. I'm sure that in person, your tactic is to shout and shout till you shout someone down. Sorry Corny the schoolyard bully tactics aint gonna work here. Your windbag tactics are simply a source of amusement..
#65
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: MORE OF THE SAME PGC BOC NOMINEE?
Another type of lie (your kind) is to discredit something simply because you dont want it to be true.
#66
RE: MORE OF THE SAME PGC BOC NOMINEE?
The 16% numberwas a mistake. And if you go back and look you'll see that it was corrected. Rather quickly I might add.
Aside from that, you know full well that what I have disputed with you is when you compare apples and oranges or add variables to suit your agenda.Context is your big problem. Many here have stated their agreement when I pointed out certain deceptions you've posted. You can be very creative with the numbers and you know full well that you leave out or insert facts as you see fit.
Aside from that, you know full well that what I have disputed with you is when you compare apples and oranges or add variables to suit your agenda.Context is your big problem. Many here have stated their agreement when I pointed out certain deceptions you've posted. You can be very creative with the numbers and you know full well that you leave out or insert facts as you see fit.
#67
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: MORE OF THE SAME PGC BOC NOMINEE?
And that's why I didn't call you a liar and make a big deal out of a simple mistake. But how would you classify RSB's continued attempts to mislead and deceive ? Is that lying or is it a mistake, even when he has the data that proves he is wrong?
#68
RE: MORE OF THE SAME PGC BOC NOMINEE?
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
And that's why I didn't call you a liar and make a big deal out of a simple mistake. But how would you classify RSB's continued attempts to mislead and deceive ? Is that lying or is it a mistake, even when he has the data that proves he is wrong?
And that's why I didn't call you a liar and make a big deal out of a simple mistake. But how would you classify RSB's continued attempts to mislead and deceive ? Is that lying or is it a mistake, even when he has the data that proves he is wrong?
You, on the other hand have a knack for pouncing on any bit of minutia that could be twisted into your agenda. For example you continued to claim that several of us had said that the average 2.5 buck had increased in antler size when in fact no one here ever said that. What was said was that the average harvested antler size(across all age groups) had increased because the age structure had increased.
You repeatedly form your own conclusions from the findings of the professionals and then behave like you have "proven" the conclusions of those very professionals wrong. Hence your infamously absurd claim that Dr Kroll doesnt understand his own research.
everyone is going to spin to his own agenda somewhat. It's to be expected some in any debatebut you have taken it to a whole new level.
Oh and repetition doesn't makea deceptionany less of a deception.
#69
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: MORE OF THE SAME PGC BOC NOMINEE?
Meanwhile every since place in this state where deer harvests have been continuously reduced for that ten, fifteen and twenty year time period the deer populations have failed to increase and instead further declined over the long term. Even though the deer numbers in the under harvest areas have gone through short bursts of increase, when environmental conditions were favorable, in all cases both their habitat and their populations declined over the long term.
You repeatedly form your own conclusions from the findings of the professionals and then behave like you have "proven" the conclusions of those very professionals wrong. Hence your infamously absurd claim that Dr Kroll doesnt understand his own research.
#70
RE: MORE OF THE SAME PGC BOC NOMINEE?
That is what RSB posted and I posted the data from the PGC that shows what he said was a flat out lie. The reason the population declined in 2G is obviously due to the increased doe harvests which resulted in harvests that exceeded recruitment. RSB continues to lie and you chose to defend him so what does that make you?
kroll's conclusion that culling 1.5 buck was ineffective was right. His conclusion that there are no inferior buck and that there is no difference between 1,5 spikes and 1.5 Ys was wrong. His research may be appropriate for a QDMA lease but it doesn't apply to PA.