bawanajim

What in the wide wide world of sports is going on around here, in all this poetic justice you all sound like a bunchof Kansas city %&#@&^%.............................

Cornelius08

THERE ONCE WAS A MAN WHO WAS MISTAKEN......
ON EVERY SINGLE POST HE WAS MAKIN'.......
HE LIED MANY TIMES.....
AND BLAMED IT ON LYMES......
WHICH ALSO CAUSED HIS DIMENTIA AND SHAKIN'

Couldnt resist.

Bwana, ya didnt realize we were all highly cultured "renaissance men" didja? LOL

bawanajim

Cultured, ya right just like the lumps in cottage cheese.

BTBowhunter

There once was a whiner named Steel
Once forced todeliverance squeal
In the woods he wont go
understandably so
so the deer he hunts now just aint real

BTBowhunter

there once was a hunter named corn
A dumber man never was born
Silly tales he would tell
most often he'd yell
making no sense just blowing his horn


Like a school yard bully is he
When he yells like aPMS she
Seemsespecially skeerd
of all guys wth a beard
When confronted his pants hewill pee

BTBowhunter

There once was big bird of blue
Of deer he had nary a clue
he'd take a big axe
and chop up the facts
tillnothing came out of him true

Cornelius08

ODE TO ALT:

THERE ONCE WAS A SHORT FAT BALD MAN....
WHO STARTED A SHAM DEER PLAN.....
AUDUBONS ARSE HE DID KISS.....
OUR DEER WE DO MISS......
NOW 98% OF HUNTERS SAY PGC CAN KISS OUR CAN



Ode to Roe:

THERE ONCE WAS A BEGGAR FOR MONEY...
AUDUBON WAS HIS TRUEST HONEY...
HE WAS CONSTANTLY ON HIS KNEES.....
SAYING PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE.....
AND ALL THE HUNTERS LAUGHED 'CAUSE THEY THOUGHTIT WAS FUNNY.

The alternate version:

There was a man who begged, when with legislators he set....
Hunters said NOT ON A BET!!....
They said go drink some diesel.....
You lying fat weasel......
And nary a dime you will get.


Ode to BTB:

There once was a man from apollo....
Both his claims and his skull were hollow....
His arms are so small.....
He may need an xgun next fall.....
And adeceitfulWCO he did blindly follow.


I think Ive expressed enough artistic talent for one day.

bluebird2

Thank you once again for shoving every one what a disaster the current seer management plan really is. In you units where the plan was successful in reducing the herd as intended (2G-4D , buck harvests steadily decreased since bonus tags were implemented in 1988. But in 2B , 5C and 5D where the plan failed to reduce the herd buck harvests continued to increase and in the case of 5B and 5C more than doubled despite declining deer habitat due to development.

I couldn't have done a better job of blowing your theory to bits , than you did yourself . Nice work once again!!

I must be slipping since I almost forgot to add the icing on the cake that makes RSB's dessert even more delightful. When the PGC switched to WMUs they told us that the goal for 2B was 10DPSM, 5C was 6 DPSM and they didn't even set a goal for 5D since they said there was o suitable deer habitat in 5D. Could it be that the deer are telling the PGC biologists that really don't know squat about the CC of the habitat.

BTBowhunter

Classic Bluebird FLIM FLAM

You post PART of RSB's information and attempt to talk about the buck harvest using his data. Lets look at the immediate preceding paragraph that you snipped off here........(underlining and red ink edited in by me)

RSB makes a point about doe harvests and you do the old switcheroo to bucks without providing any supporting data. Here we go again........

R.S.B.

Actually you are correct that the plan has failed.

The plan in those special regulations areas was to implement unlimited antler less license and allow hunters to harvests as many deer as they could in order to reduce the deer herd and human conflicts around the major metropolitan areas.

That plan did fail the deer proved that where they had sufficient food supplies hunters couldn’t over harvest their ability to recruit even more deer then hunters could kill. Even when hunters were killing almost five times as many deer per square mile, city streets includes, as what hunters were killing in the big woods habitat damaged areas the hunters couldn’t reduce the deer populations.

You are also correct that the hunter/politician forced plan of lower license allocations to create more deer in those northern tier units has been a failure. Hunters were sure that if they could force the Game Commission to reduce the allocations they would have more deer for the future. The Game Commission listened to those hunters and did reduce the allocation and antler less harvests, but it sure didn’t result in having more deer. So you are correct that too was a failure since the intent was to give the hunters what they wanted. The problem is that giving hunters what they want isn’t really what they want since most of the hunters have no idea about the inter-relationship between the deer food and the deer numbers of the future.

If hunters had allowed the Game Commission professionals to keep issuing more antler less license in these northern units decades ago and up through current seasons I am confident we would have a lot more deer in those areas today then want we have. If hunters had the professionals to do the right thing hunters would not only have been harvesting more deer but they would still have a lot more deer.

Hunters should learn something from those two totally separate management directions and then allow the professionals to use the method that is proven to result in increasing deer numbers instead of demanding the method that is proven to result in lower deer numbers for the future.

At least you are helping to make it easier to illustrate and profile those two different management directions and how they have both failed to produce the result hunters expected.

R.S. Bodenhorn