Is the P.G.C. in suicide mode?
#31
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio,mid
Posts: 1,275
RE: Is the P.G.C. in suicide mode?
If yer monniker is correct, yer gonna get told to go home or stay out of PA w/ your comments. Love that one. That is exactly what they would like you to beleive, that the majority wanted no Xbows.
RMEF, I am thinking the farmers were complaining about damage which is a very real problem on the slopes up there, hence increase population control/ . However, the PGC should have given the tagto them.
RMEF, I am thinking the farmers were complaining about damage which is a very real problem on the slopes up there, hence increase population control/ . However, the PGC should have given the tagto them.
#32
Fork Horn
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 282
RE: Is the P.G.C. in suicide mode?
ORIGINAL: Buck Hunter 1
If yer monniker is correct, yer gonna get told to go home or stay out of PA w/ your comments. Love that one. That is exactly what they would like you to beleive, that the majority wanted no Xbows.
RMEF, I am thinking the farmers were complaining about damage which is a very real problem on the slopes up there, hence increase population control/ . However, the PGC should have given the tagto them.
If yer monniker is correct, yer gonna get told to go home or stay out of PA w/ your comments. Love that one. That is exactly what they would like you to beleive, that the majority wanted no Xbows.
RMEF, I am thinking the farmers were complaining about damage which is a very real problem on the slopes up there, hence increase population control/ . However, the PGC should have given the tagto them.
#33
RE: Is the P.G.C. in suicide mode?
ORIGINAL: the outsider
ManySpurs, thanks but that didn't answer my question. Of those who corresponded, who was represented? Any group such as the UBP can flood the BOC with their views while the majority remains silent. I don't have anything against the UBP, but I am trying to understand who was opposed to inclusion.
ManySpurs, thanks but that didn't answer my question. Of those who corresponded, who was represented? Any group such as the UBP can flood the BOC with their views while the majority remains silent. I don't have anything against the UBP, but I am trying to understand who was opposed to inclusion.
#34
Fork Horn
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 282
RE: Is the P.G.C. in suicide mode?
Thanks for the response ManySpurs. I automaticallythrow upa flag when I hear a phrase like "the majority don't want it". Or was it the verbal minority that don't? I'm just trying to understand what's behind allthat Idon't see.
#35
RE: Is the P.G.C. in suicide mode?
90% of those who cared enough to write were against it. Undoubtedly the UBP had a lot to do with that. Not sure what your point is.What's important or ought to be isthat it didnt seem to matter enoughto any other groups to bother to voice their opinion and it didnt matter to the BOC what the results were among those who cared enough to voice an opinon. What REALLY stinks is that one board member will now reap finacial rewards as a direct result of full inclusion because he owns a shop that sells xbows. He should have recused himself from the whole process.
#38
Fork Horn
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 282
RE: Is the P.G.C. in suicide mode?
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
90% of those who cared enough to write were against it. Undoubtedly the UBP had a lot to do with that. Not sure what your point is.What's important or ought to be isthat it didnt seem to matter enoughto any other groups to bother to voice their opinion and it didnt matter to the BOC what the results were among those who cared enough to voice an opinon. What REALLY stinks is that one board member will now reap finacial rewards as a direct result of full inclusion because he owns a shop that sells xbows. He should have recused himself from the whole process.
90% of those who cared enough to write were against it. Undoubtedly the UBP had a lot to do with that. Not sure what your point is.What's important or ought to be isthat it didnt seem to matter enoughto any other groups to bother to voice their opinion and it didnt matter to the BOC what the results were among those who cared enough to voice an opinon. What REALLY stinks is that one board member will now reap finacial rewards as a direct result of full inclusion because he owns a shop that sells xbows. He should have recused himself from the whole process.
#39
RE: Is the P.G.C. in suicide mode?
ORIGINAL: the outsider
The point is I like to have an informed opinion rather than an uninformed one. That's why I'm looking to understand what's behind the BOC's decisions, and the motivation of others.
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
90% of those who cared enough to write were against it. Undoubtedly the UBP had a lot to do with that. Not sure what your point is.What's important or ought to be isthat it didnt seem to matter enoughto any other groups to bother to voice their opinion and it didnt matter to the BOC what the results were among those who cared enough to voice an opinon. What REALLY stinks is that one board member will now reap finacial rewards as a direct result of full inclusion because he owns a shop that sells xbows. He should have recused himself from the whole process.
90% of those who cared enough to write were against it. Undoubtedly the UBP had a lot to do with that. Not sure what your point is.What's important or ought to be isthat it didnt seem to matter enoughto any other groups to bother to voice their opinion and it didnt matter to the BOC what the results were among those who cared enough to voice an opinon. What REALLY stinks is that one board member will now reap finacial rewards as a direct result of full inclusion because he owns a shop that sells xbows. He should have recused himself from the whole process.