Mohr needs to regroup
#22
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
So are you going to apologize now for the plagiarism comment or spend the night in a fruitless googla search?
(hint,hint, try "mud logging")
I guess I can wait till tomorrow for the apologies.I'm sure you have no other plans for the evening,and I have a few more hours of work to do so I'll keep an ear open.
Another hint try "microbiological subterranean" [8D]
(hint,hint, try "mud logging")
I guess I can wait till tomorrow for the apologies.I'm sure you have no other plans for the evening,and I have a few more hours of work to do so I'll keep an ear open.
Another hint try "microbiological subterranean" [8D]
#23
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
Everyone knows you are copying and pasting from a report so there is no need for me to find the report you are copying. But asking for an apology when you know you are guilty is about as low as you can get.
#24
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Everyone knows you are copying and pasting from a report so there is no need for me to find the report you are copying. But asking for an apology when you know you are guilty is about as low as you can get.
Everyone knows you are copying and pasting from a report so there is no need for me to find the report you are copying. But asking for an apology when you know you are guilty is about as low as you can get.
My lessons aren't for free normally ,but I'll make an exception for you just this once.
You keep searching,there are plenty of keywords there for you to use,of course " if " youfail tofind anything you can always make something up,just like you usually do.
Google isn't the only search engine ,hint hint
#27
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Sorry to disappoint you but I am not about to search for a report that proves you are lying. You just aren't worth the effort.
Sorry to disappoint you but I am not about to search for a report that proves you are lying. You just aren't worth the effort.
#28
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
LOL
Are you gonna tell him where you got those big words soon Jim?
I'm thinking he simply didn't understand your posts. Anyone who has read at all about the marcellus shale gas should be able to spot your source in a New York Minute
Are you gonna tell him where you got those big words soon Jim?
I'm thinking he simply didn't understand your posts. Anyone who has read at all about the marcellus shale gas should be able to spot your source in a New York Minute
#29
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
To get back on topic Jim,
The deamortized returns are expected to have an inverse relationship with the known subterrainian aquifereous risks. That likely will lead to a disabatement of the potential liabilities
The unlikely welcome of a cash influx could possibly be offset by an increase of potential liability for cost overruns or unintentional waste watershed damage.Which clearly would be an unwelcome response to an other wise rapid dash for cash by anoperational break through in a forced funding dilemma.
#30
RE: Mohr needs to regroup
I've put it on the table about a dozen times now but I sure as hell ain't putting a chalk line around it for him.
I think his google tool bar is stuck on declining breeding rates instead of the tiny molecular structures that make up the subterranean aquiferial life forms that this kind of interference decreases.
I'm not sure if he will ever get it?
I think his google tool bar is stuck on declining breeding rates instead of the tiny molecular structures that make up the subterranean aquiferial life forms that this kind of interference decreases.
I'm not sure if he will ever get it?