Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
#221
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 169
RE: Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
ORIGINAL: bowtruck
there is some ny hunters not seeing as many deer either of course they can get 5 tags over the counter
there is some ny hunters not seeing as many deer either of course they can get 5 tags over the counter
#222
RE: Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
#223
RE: Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
No reply. What a bozo.
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
#224
RE: Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
ORIGINAL: R.S.B.
2006
1.………….Wisconsin…………………9.3
2.………….Maryland………………….9.2
3.………….Penna……………………..8.1
4.………….Michigan………………….7.9
5.………….New Jersey………………..7.6
6.………….Delaware………………….7.3
7.………….Ohio………………………5.8
8.………….W.Virginia………………..5.7
9.………….Virginia…………………..5.6
10.…………Missouri………………….4.7
If I could find the 2007 harvest data for the other states I would gladly include that year too but so far I haven’t been able to find the 2007 data for those other states. I do know that the Pennsylvania deer harvest in 2007 was 7.2 deer per square mile. R.S. Bodenhorn
2006
1.………….Wisconsin…………………9.3
2.………….Maryland………………….9.2
3.………….Penna……………………..8.1
4.………….Michigan………………….7.9
5.………….New Jersey………………..7.6
6.………….Delaware………………….7.3
7.………….Ohio………………………5.8
8.………….W.Virginia………………..5.7
9.………….Virginia…………………..5.6
10.…………Missouri………………….4.7
If I could find the 2007 harvest data for the other states I would gladly include that year too but so far I haven’t been able to find the 2007 data for those other states. I do know that the Pennsylvania deer harvest in 2007 was 7.2 deer per square mile. R.S. Bodenhorn
Virginia's 2007 harvest was 241,576 Deer or 6.09 DH/PSM and that's an actual reported harvest.
Wow, just think, using the infamous"PA Calculated method", those numbers would roughly be 483,152 and 12.18 DH/PSM.
Strange how some states remain nearly stable or slowly keep moving up year after year, while others are moving down at a much faster pace. I guess PA hasn't really stabilized their Deer Population yet after all (as so often claimed), hey?
.
#225
RE: Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
Only a bozo would need further explanation
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
No reply. What a bozo.
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
#226
RE: Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
Oh really? Perhaps you can explain what he means by that statement? I am sure it was another very flattering remark towards hunters.
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
Only a bozo would need further explanation
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
No reply. What a bozo.
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
IMHO, He was simply referrring to the fact that Michigan has less hunting pressure.
#227
RE: Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
I took it as a way of saying that we have more hunting pressure.Chewing up the forestwas aphrase I could picture any hunter saying after seeing heavy hunting pressure. What would you say if you pulled up topark at your favorite spot and found dozens of boot tracks? Stomped out? Beat to sh__? Chewed up? Pounded out? Sproul calls em crews. I call it the Punkin army.Otherscall it the weekend warrior invasion.
IMHO, He was simply referrring to the fact that Michigan has less hunting pressure.
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
Oh really? Perhaps you can explain what he means by that statement? I am sure it was another very flattering remark towards hunters.
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
Only a bozo would need further explanation
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
No reply. What a bozo.
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
IMHO, He was simply referrring to the fact that Michigan has less hunting pressure.
#228
RE: Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
Alright. That seems fair. Perhaps, I am looking too hard for D i c k to slip up again.
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
I took it as a way of saying that we have more hunting pressure.Chewing up the forestwas aphrase I could picture any hunter saying after seeing heavy hunting pressure. What would you say if you pulled up topark at your favorite spot and found dozens of boot tracks? Stomped out? Beat to sh__? Chewed up? Pounded out? Sproul calls em crews. I call it the Punkin army.Otherscall it the weekend warrior invasion.
IMHO, He was simply referrring to the fact that Michigan has less hunting pressure.
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
Oh really? Perhaps you can explain what he means by that statement? I am sure it was another very flattering remark towards hunters.
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
Only a bozo would need further explanation
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
No reply. What a bozo.
ORIGINAL: Maverick 1
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
Michigan has fewer people chewing up their forest??? I would really love to know what you mean by that one D i c k. Care to explain yourself?
IMHO, He was simply referrring to the fact that Michigan has less hunting pressure.
I dont think RSB is out to disparage hunters. He madea very ill advised statement alillte whie back which, BTW, he expressed regret for and corrected. If you look at his posts overall, he isusually quiterespectful of hunters in general even tghough I'm sure he sees more of the worst than most of us do.When he is critical on here, it is usually in direct response to something posted that was far worse. I'm certainly not offering any 100% unconditional backing. I was very vocal when I thought he was wrong.Just imagine though,posting on here from where he sits? I think he must genuinely like and respect most hunters just tobe willingto post on this forum
#229
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
I dont think RSB is out to disparage hunters.
#230
RE: Pennsylvania hunters about to be "HOSED"
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
He does it over and over again when he claims hunters prevented the PGC from controlling the herd. He ignores the fact that the PGC states the herd in 2G was at it's goal in 1999 and that for the last 20 years the antlerless harvests have exceeded the antlered harvest every year but one and that was in 1999 and it was due to 3 days of rain during doe season. Furthermore ,in 1999 the PGC issued a record 890,700 doe tags.
I dont think RSB is out to disparage hunters.