Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
01-10-2009, 03:06 PM
#112
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW PA USA
Posts: 7,220
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
First of all, Bowtruck, Tsoc, Livbucks, all you guys... Thanks for the support!
OH BOO HOO HOO!!!
You have had so manyaliases on here tocircumvent prior bans and deletion of yourposts it's ridiculous.You've even sunk to creating screen name account using your wifes name to dodge the mods.
Please explain the difference betweena play on words with your screen nameand your constant attacks, relentless distortions and yes, name callinganyone and everyone who disagrees with your warped ideas of how things oughtnot to be. (I sayought not to be because you seldom, if ever, offer any solutions)
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
what would you call this.
My screen name is Bluebird ,not Bluejob BS and you know exactly what he was implying.
Here's another example.
ORIGINAL: bowtruck
bb i havent seen any namecalling cheap shot from btb
bb i havent seen any namecalling cheap shot from btb
No, I have consistently said spikes are inferior for the rate of antler development and there is no evidence that it is not due to being genetically inferior.
(The red ink was my editing)
Classic Bluejob BS
(The red ink was my editing)
Classic Bluejob BS
My screen name is Bluebird ,not Bluejob BS and you know exactly what he was implying.
Here's another example.
Pedro, Blueboy
You have had so manyaliases on here tocircumvent prior bans and deletion of yourposts it's ridiculous.You've even sunk to creating screen name account using your wifes name to dodge the mods.
Please explain the difference betweena play on words with your screen nameand your constant attacks, relentless distortions and yes, name callinganyone and everyone who disagrees with your warped ideas of how things oughtnot to be. (I sayought not to be because you seldom, if ever, offer any solutions)
01-10-2009, 03:39 PM
#113
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
Please explain the difference between a play on words with your screen name and your constant attacks, relentless distortions and yes, name calling anyone and everyone who disagrees with your warped ideas of how things ought not to be
You didn't use a play on words ,you changed my screen name from Bluebird 2 to Bluejob and that is about as low as anyone can get on a MB without being banned.
01-10-2009, 03:43 PM
#114
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW PA USA
Posts: 7,220
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Would you care to provide a few examples to support your malicious and false accusations.
You didn't use a play on words ,you changed my screen name from Bluebird 2 to Bluejob and that is about as low as anyone can get on a MB without being banned.
Please explain the difference betweena play on words with your screen nameand your constant attacks, relentless distortions and yes, name callinganyone and everyone who disagrees with your warped ideas of how things oughtnot to be
You didn't use a play on words ,you changed my screen name from Bluebird 2 to Bluejob and that is about as low as anyone can get on a MB without being banned.
01-10-2009, 04:02 PM
#116
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW PA USA
Posts: 7,220
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
I know when some one can't support their position with facts ,they often resort to name calling and personal insults.
I know when some one can't support their position with facts ,they often resort to name calling and personal insults.
01-10-2009, 04:08 PM
#117
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
That description suits you to a T. You make a lot of claims but never support them with independent documentation. Now post the AR states that lead the record books. you can't do it because it isn't true!!
01-10-2009, 04:24 PM
#118
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,236
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
You should go back to impersonating a woman,
Larry. Those were good times.
So you are claiming that 1.5 year old spikes are genetically inferior? You just denied that a couple days ago.
(in reply to blueJob)
Larry. Those were good times.
So you are claiming that 1.5 year old spikes are genetically inferior? You just denied that a couple days ago.
(in reply to blueJob)
01-10-2009, 05:01 PM
#119
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
So you are claiming that 1.5 year old spikes are genetically inferior? You just denied that a couple days ago.
(in reply to blueJob)
(in reply to blueJob)
bb 