"PA deer mismanagement"
#71
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,149
RE: "PA deer mismanagement"
Hold the phone there BT.This topic isn't closed yet.
I know one thing,the deer around our camp are being killed by hunters.As for these collared deer I still have questions.
First of all that area has alot less hunters then it did in the past.Back in say the 80's I'll bet there was more then triple the amount of hunters there are today.Maybe somebody on here can answer that familar with the area.If this is true at that time a higher percentage of deer would have been killed by hunters especially during the first couple of years of brown it's down.In some of the more remote places I'm seeing few hunters anymore so of coarse the percentage of deer kills will go down.Now that brings back the question of why the herd in those remote regions isn't growing in leaps and bounds.Since everybody else has a theory including the dcnr,here's mine.
In the 80's there were alot more deer hunters in the NC including the remote areas.I know because I hunted them.During the first couple of years of massive herd reduction the deer numbers dropped drastically.{don't deny this doug}So you still have the predators with alot less dinnerfare running around the woods.The few deer that are left are hunted harder and have more stress put on them especially in winter when they don't need that.Hence the low deer numbers.
That's my theory until somebody shows me otherwise.Now let's go to the habitat.It sucked over 20 years ago when I hunted potter and clearfield.Lot's of wide open woods where a fellow could see forever and see all these doe and small bucks everybody talks about.We figured it out though and hunted in thick stuff with treestands and 50 yard shots at the most.{rifle}Got some dandy bucks.Those deer numbers existed throughout the 70's into the 90's up to herd reduction.So I'm supposed to believe the habitat crashed the same time herd reduction started?Hmmm.
We had some terrible winters back then including the infamous snow/ice storms that killed alot of deer just from sliding down the mountains.Yet the years following that winter I still saw the high numbers people talk about.Those woods in potter county have been open for a long long time and the deer stayed high in numbers for many years.Anyone interested the area is around patterson on rte 44.I just have questions because of what my own eyes have witnessed throughout the years.To be honest I hope in the end I find out I'm wrong and everything audubon,greenpeace,and the DCNR is telling us is the truth because my trust in government right now is low anyway.Right now I can't trust debernliberal after checking his profile and history.Left wingers make me nervous.
I know one thing,the deer around our camp are being killed by hunters.As for these collared deer I still have questions.
First of all that area has alot less hunters then it did in the past.Back in say the 80's I'll bet there was more then triple the amount of hunters there are today.Maybe somebody on here can answer that familar with the area.If this is true at that time a higher percentage of deer would have been killed by hunters especially during the first couple of years of brown it's down.In some of the more remote places I'm seeing few hunters anymore so of coarse the percentage of deer kills will go down.Now that brings back the question of why the herd in those remote regions isn't growing in leaps and bounds.Since everybody else has a theory including the dcnr,here's mine.
In the 80's there were alot more deer hunters in the NC including the remote areas.I know because I hunted them.During the first couple of years of massive herd reduction the deer numbers dropped drastically.{don't deny this doug}So you still have the predators with alot less dinnerfare running around the woods.The few deer that are left are hunted harder and have more stress put on them especially in winter when they don't need that.Hence the low deer numbers.
That's my theory until somebody shows me otherwise.Now let's go to the habitat.It sucked over 20 years ago when I hunted potter and clearfield.Lot's of wide open woods where a fellow could see forever and see all these doe and small bucks everybody talks about.We figured it out though and hunted in thick stuff with treestands and 50 yard shots at the most.{rifle}Got some dandy bucks.Those deer numbers existed throughout the 70's into the 90's up to herd reduction.So I'm supposed to believe the habitat crashed the same time herd reduction started?Hmmm.
We had some terrible winters back then including the infamous snow/ice storms that killed alot of deer just from sliding down the mountains.Yet the years following that winter I still saw the high numbers people talk about.Those woods in potter county have been open for a long long time and the deer stayed high in numbers for many years.Anyone interested the area is around patterson on rte 44.I just have questions because of what my own eyes have witnessed throughout the years.To be honest I hope in the end I find out I'm wrong and everything audubon,greenpeace,and the DCNR is telling us is the truth because my trust in government right now is low anyway.Right now I can't trust debernliberal after checking his profile and history.Left wingers make me nervous.
#73
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PA.
Posts: 5,195
RE: "PA deer mismanagement"
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
I notice that the naysayers have no, none, nada, zip, zero, answers as to how it is that such a low percentage of tagged and collared doe are being harvested by hunters in an area where hunting pressure is supposed to be the culprit in the declining numbers.
One year could have been a fluke but two years shows a pattern developing. It obviously aint the doe tags or the hunting pressure that's responsible here!
I notice that the naysayers have no, none, nada, zip, zero, answers as to how it is that such a low percentage of tagged and collared doe are being harvested by hunters in an area where hunting pressure is supposed to be the culprit in the declining numbers.
One year could have been a fluke but two years shows a pattern developing. It obviously aint the doe tags or the hunting pressure that's responsible here!
they told me they will not and DONT WANT ANYONE ELSE killing doe in that area..
has this caused those deer not to be shot, yes..
they tell hunters in their crew to go elsewhere to kill a doe..elsewhere is where i hunt,so my doe are being wiped out..they are not stupid enough to kill off all their doe..
next. do hunters turn in their kill reports?could be same with collars..
does hunter leave deer go if it is wearing collar,i bet so..
does hunter want easier area to kill a DOE,yes..
all this could be reason, i dont know ..i would bet that most throw collar away for some reason..that would be my first thought..
#74
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PA.
Posts: 5,195
RE: "PA deer mismanagement"
ORIGINAL: DougE
They do cut the trees on the game lands around here.They don't cuttoo many,as that would create more problems in the future but the habitat on our game lands is much better than most of the private land.
I want to retract my statement about no collared deer being killed in the Sproul.One was killed in the early muzzleloader season and at least three were killed during the first few days of rifle season.The final results aren't out yet but that's still an extremely smallpercentage of deer being taken by hunters.
They do cut the trees on the game lands around here.They don't cuttoo many,as that would create more problems in the future but the habitat on our game lands is much better than most of the private land.
I want to retract my statement about no collared deer being killed in the Sproul.One was killed in the early muzzleloader season and at least three were killed during the first few days of rifle season.The final results aren't out yet but that's still an extremely smallpercentage of deer being taken by hunters.
how many deer did they tag?this is all new to me,first time i heard it..
#75
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,236
RE: "PA deer mismanagement"
I put two horses in about a half acre pasture last August,that was full of clover.Within 3 weeks,every single bit of it was grazed down to the dirt.Deer have thesame effect on the habitat.
You are comparing tiny little apples to big jumbo oranges here.
My family has horses...I know this.
I know that there are far more deer than horses, yet nobody hauls deer manure to fertilize their gardens. WHY IS THAT?
#77
RE: "PA deer mismanagement"
ORIGINAL: sproulman
i dont know nothing about collars on deer..lets talk about that area..there is big crew in camp i known all my life innthat area..
they told me they will not and DONT WANT ANYONE ELSE killing doe in that area..
has this caused those deer not to be shot, yes..
they tell hunters in their crew to go elsewhere to kill a doe..elsewhere is where i hunt,so my doe are being wiped out..they are not stupid enough to kill off all their doe..
next. do hunters turn in their kill reports?could be same with collars..
does hunter leave deer go if it is wearing collar,i bet so..
does hunter want easier area to kill a DOE,yes..
all this could be reason, i dont know ..i would bet that most throw collar away for some reason..that would be my first thought..
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
I notice that the naysayers have no, none, nada, zip, zero, answers as to how it is that such a low percentage of tagged and collared doe are being harvested by hunters in an area where hunting pressure is supposed to be the culprit in the declining numbers.
One year could have been a fluke but two years shows a pattern developing. It obviously aint the doe tags or the hunting pressure that's responsible here!
I notice that the naysayers have no, none, nada, zip, zero, answers as to how it is that such a low percentage of tagged and collared doe are being harvested by hunters in an area where hunting pressure is supposed to be the culprit in the declining numbers.
One year could have been a fluke but two years shows a pattern developing. It obviously aint the doe tags or the hunting pressure that's responsible here!
they told me they will not and DONT WANT ANYONE ELSE killing doe in that area..
has this caused those deer not to be shot, yes..
they tell hunters in their crew to go elsewhere to kill a doe..elsewhere is where i hunt,so my doe are being wiped out..they are not stupid enough to kill off all their doe..
next. do hunters turn in their kill reports?could be same with collars..
does hunter leave deer go if it is wearing collar,i bet so..
does hunter want easier area to kill a DOE,yes..
all this could be reason, i dont know ..i would bet that most throw collar away for some reason..that would be my first thought..
#78
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,236
RE: "PA deer mismanagement"
ORIGINAL: germain
clovers are actually pretty high in protein depending what type it is.
clovers are actually pretty high in protein depending what type it is.
#79
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,149
RE: "PA deer mismanagement"
agree liv.In our area I noticed the deer seem to use the clover as a mid-day snack or a chew on the way to acorns or another food source.Rape and turnips seem to be a different story becoming the main dinner fare.That seems to be the case for us.
#80
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,149
RE: "PA deer mismanagement"
BT,what's your opinion on my post?Also I'm surprised nobody is concerned with greenpeace being involved in forest certification.Does everybody know they are an extreme animal rights group which I think was put on the government's list as a terrorist organization.