Interesting Webpage
#22
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 232
RE: Interesting Webpage
ORIGINAL: AJ52
2nd Time; Where did your 75% and then 90% figure come from on clear cut article.
This is why I/WE want proof when you utter anything thru your keyboard!
As far as I'm concerned I'm talking to a NON HUNTER who cruises the web to the tune of 16,000+ posts! You can't possibly have time to hunt or even "observe" deer in the wild.
And you want us to swallow all this crap you babble thru your key board as the gospel.
BTW any idiot can see the browse line in the pic and deduce it was caused by Deer - WOW. Why would we need to confer with you or anybody else about a browse line.
2nd Time; Where did your 75% and then 90% figure come from on clear cut article.
This is why I/WE want proof when you utter anything thru your keyboard!
As far as I'm concerned I'm talking to a NON HUNTER who cruises the web to the tune of 16,000+ posts! You can't possibly have time to hunt or even "observe" deer in the wild.
And you want us to swallow all this crap you babble thru your key board as the gospel.
BTW any idiot can see the browse line in the pic and deduce it was caused by Deer - WOW. Why would we need to confer with you or anybody else about a browse line.
Since when is it acceptable for a moderator to take unsubstantiated cheap shots at a board member he disagrees with on a personal level?
I can assure I am a hunter who has hunted Montana ,Wyo., PA, NY. and Tenn. I have shot deer with abow,pistol, ML and rifle I only missed one PA deer season in 50 years and that was when I was serving in Viet Nam,so you shouldn't hold that agaist me.
BTW any idiot can see the browse line in the pic and deduce it was caused by Deer - WOW. Why would we need to confer with you or anybody else about a browse line.
#23
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 232
RE: Interesting Webpage
ORIGINAL: AJ52
The way I'm reading,you read the clear cut article incorrectly again and mis-quoted. I let you figure it out. You are not a form of credible information.
The way I'm reading,you read the clear cut article incorrectly again and mis-quoted. I let you figure it out. You are not a form of credible information.
Now , quote the specifics from the article that shows I am wrong. The article is the source of credible information, not me. I simply preformed simple math to show that 90% of the clearcuts were succcessful.
Now the balls in your court. Show everybody why I am wrong. you can't do it because you don't understand simple math.
#24
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Slower Lower Delaware 1st State
Posts: 1,776
RE: Interesting Webpage
DD Your last paragraph says everything about you and your posts. I can't hold much stock in your info or comments. You have misquoted figures on at least one link. What makes me think ANY of your quotes as to statements made by ALL your phantom experts or ALT and any "supposed" related data are acccurate.
You have produced only one name of ALL the QDM managers you spoke of. Where's the beef.
You've tryed the, "You're not from PA so you don't understand" attack - doesn't wash.
Much of what you speak on AR,QDM,Harvest data,B/D ratio's,late breeding,browse lines etc... can affect the opinions of hunters in any state on this MB.
As a user and long time member of HN, All of your posts that I can ever recall ARE of Negative content,inacurate,slanted, incomplete quotes from some phantom expert(s).
Bottom line - post something of a positive nature, or share your own personal hunting experiances.That's much of what this MB is all about. If you can't - don't expect any kudo's here.
You have produced only one name of ALL the QDM managers you spoke of. Where's the beef.
You've tryed the, "You're not from PA so you don't understand" attack - doesn't wash.
Much of what you speak on AR,QDM,Harvest data,B/D ratio's,late breeding,browse lines etc... can affect the opinions of hunters in any state on this MB.
As a user and long time member of HN, All of your posts that I can ever recall ARE of Negative content,inacurate,slanted, incomplete quotes from some phantom expert(s).
Bottom line - post something of a positive nature, or share your own personal hunting experiances.That's much of what this MB is all about. If you can't - don't expect any kudo's here.
#27
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 232
RE: Interesting Webpage
Once again you have launched a negative personal attack without one bit of evidence to support your biased misguided accssations. I provided specific PGC data on the 2.5+ buck harvest and ask you to back up you claims and false accussations and all you could do is is bob and weave.
It's time to be a man a cite specifis ,but I realize that is beyond you since you can't even read a simple ,very clear and explicit article and understand what it says.
It's time to be a man a cite specifis ,but I realize that is beyond you since you can't even read a simple ,very clear and explicit article and understand what it says.
#28
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 232
RE: Interesting Webpage
ORIGINAL: model99er
Curious, does anyone happen to know what percent of PA forests are in the "old growth" state??
99er
Curious, does anyone happen to know what percent of PA forests are in the "old growth" state??
99er
#29
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Slower Lower Delaware 1st State
Posts: 1,776
RE: Interesting Webpage
You sir not me have been asked on several occasions by myself and others to post your sources. You have not responded.
You cannot recognize the differance between 41 and 42 clearcuts clearly printed in a link you posted. You expect myself or others to respond to YOU. Bahh - Hummm Bug.
You cannot recognize the differance between 41 and 42 clearcuts clearly printed in a link you posted. You expect myself or others to respond to YOU. Bahh - Hummm Bug.
#30
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 232
RE: Interesting Webpage
You sir not me have been asked on several occasions by myself and others to post your sources. You have not responded.