.264 mag.
#2
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: mobile, alabama
Posts: 430
RE: .264 mag.
renfrowriidge,
The last chambering of this cartridge , other than custom,I think was a Remington 700 Classic, and I beleive that was in 1986. Anyway, I have a gundealer friend that has one new in the box for 849.00. Other than that, look on gunbroker, gunsamerica, etc. and be prepared to "pony up " the big bucks.
The last chambering of this cartridge , other than custom,I think was a Remington 700 Classic, and I beleive that was in 1986. Anyway, I have a gundealer friend that has one new in the box for 849.00. Other than that, look on gunbroker, gunsamerica, etc. and be prepared to "pony up " the big bucks.
#3
#6
#7
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: mobile, alabama
Posts: 430
RE: .264 mag.
RENFROWRIDGE,
Trying to find a nice 264 win mag is hard enough, now we're throwing LH into the mix? No, the one I know about is RH. However, I am a lefty, Ihave been shooting Rh actions so long I can't shoot a LH action. Good luck to your friend. That's gonna be a tough one!
Trying to find a nice 264 win mag is hard enough, now we're throwing LH into the mix? No, the one I know about is RH. However, I am a lefty, Ihave been shooting Rh actions so long I can't shoot a LH action. Good luck to your friend. That's gonna be a tough one!
#10
RE: .264 mag.
It was a good caliber but ahead of its time. I should say ahead of its powders. When it came out there were not many good slow burning powders for it. That is no loonger true and it would be a fine long range deer antelope and elk cartridge. As mentioned above the best if not only way to get one would be to rebarrel a LH 7MM Mag. It may be a worth while conversion but you would gain nothing over the 7 Mag as is.