Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Amazing! Hornady Debunks Sir Isaac Newton

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-20-2010, 07:12 AM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
Default Amazing! Hornady Debunks Sir Isaac Newton

Hornady has proven that the old adage of "every action has an equal and opposite reaction etc..." is incorrect....

I'm so wowed by their innovation I'm lost for intelligent words.

http://www.hornady.com/store/Superformance

Tom
statjunk is offline  
Old 08-20-2010, 07:41 AM
  #2  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wide open Nevada
Posts: 515
Default

Well at $2.40 per shot for 243 ,at least from where I'm standing, it better kill clean if I hit with in a foot of the game and a coyote better just drop cause I pointed toward it.

I'm sure its the greatest thing since the pocket . If I need a 300 Win Mag instead of my 06' I'll put the Whelen bbl on my Sav 110LH and keep shooting my tired old slow poke hand loads for $6 a box.
harter66 is offline  
Old 08-20-2010, 09:01 AM
  #3  
Typical Buck
 
RenaissanceBiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 675
Default

It may reduce felt recoil, but no laws of physics are violated.
RenaissanceBiker is offline  
Old 08-20-2010, 09:31 AM
  #4  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Actually they might not.

You can't just consider the projectile wieght, but also have to consider the powder wieght.

If you had one load 180gr projectile along with 100gr of blackpowder to achieve 2000fps, and then you had a different load wit 180gr projectile with 15gr of powder kicking at 2000fps, then the one with 15gr would kick less.

You got to remember, the powder is being pushed out too. Its still mass. Just mass that turnes to hot gas.
 
Old 08-20-2010, 10:18 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
Default

BC,

I'd have to believe that in the scenario that you've provided the mass of the powder would have to provide very little to felt recoil.

Also I can't get past that if you're still going the same 2000 fps that the same amount of energy had to be created and thus would recoil identically.

Not only does Hornady not compare the same velocities but they are saying you'll get more velocity.

Unless you provide additional proof I'm going to have to go with hawg wash.

Tom
statjunk is offline  
Old 08-20-2010, 10:28 AM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,926
Default It is just amazing

the modern engineering needed to harvest one of these new armor plated deer. Wonder if you have to be accurate, as you did in the old days.
Valentine is offline  
Old 08-20-2010, 10:50 AM
  #7  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by statjunk
BC,

I'd have to believe that in the scenario that you've provided the mass of the powder would have to provide very little to felt recoil.

Also I can't get past that if you're still going the same 2000 fps that the same amount of energy had to be created and thus would recoil identically.

Not only does Hornady not compare the same velocities but they are saying you'll get more velocity.

Unless you provide additional proof I'm going to have to go with hawg wash.

Tom
No, look up calculating free recoil of a gun. Powder is mass, and those hot gases have mass and actually more velocity than the projectile. Have you ever shot a savage smokeless ML? I have and you will see significally less recoil with even higher velocity than a typcial 100gr 240gr load.

This page is very accurate. Play around with load and watch the significant drop
http://kwk.us/recoil.html
 
Old 08-20-2010, 11:36 AM
  #8  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 604
Default

Originally Posted by statjunk
BC,

I'd have to believe that in the scenario that you've provided the mass of the powder would have to provide very little to felt recoil.

Also I can't get past that if you're still going the same 2000 fps that the same amount of energy had to be created and thus would recoil identically.

Not only does Hornady not compare the same velocities but they are saying you'll get more velocity.

Unless you provide additional proof I'm going to have to go with hawg wash.

Tom
BC is right on the money. When the bullet exits the muzzle the gases from the powder actually accelerate and according to Newtons Law that will increase recoil. The 165 grain Light Magnum 06 loads I used a few years back had 63 grains of powder which is a heavy charge for an 06. I am slightly exceeding the Light Mag velocity with a 168 grain bullet and a 59 grain powder charge and the Light Mags actally kick a little harder.

If Hornady is getting the same velocity from a smaller powder charge then according to Newton the recoil will be less.

Here is a recoil calculator that you can plug in 2 different powder charges to see the change.

http://www.biggameinfo.com/RecoilCalc.aspx
Scott Gags is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 05:39 AM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
Default

I had forgotten about this post. Glad I found it. I stand corrected.

So by this regard, can we assume that one day the ol .30-06 could end up being a Magnum?

Tom
statjunk is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 07:08 AM
  #10  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by statjunk
I had forgotten about this post. Glad I found it. I stand corrected.

So by this regard, can we assume that one day the ol .30-06 could end up being a Magnum?

Tom
Think about it, back in the day 300H&H was the bigboy, now 30-06 can come very close.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.