Amazing! Hornady Debunks Sir Isaac Newton
#1
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
Amazing! Hornady Debunks Sir Isaac Newton
Hornady has proven that the old adage of "every action has an equal and opposite reaction etc..." is incorrect....
I'm so wowed by their innovation I'm lost for intelligent words.
http://www.hornady.com/store/Superformance
Tom
I'm so wowed by their innovation I'm lost for intelligent words.
http://www.hornady.com/store/Superformance
Tom
#2
Typical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wide open Nevada
Posts: 515
Well at $2.40 per shot for 243 ,at least from where I'm standing, it better kill clean if I hit with in a foot of the game and a coyote better just drop cause I pointed toward it.
I'm sure its the greatest thing since the pocket . If I need a 300 Win Mag instead of my 06' I'll put the Whelen bbl on my Sav 110LH and keep shooting my tired old slow poke hand loads for $6 a box.
I'm sure its the greatest thing since the pocket . If I need a 300 Win Mag instead of my 06' I'll put the Whelen bbl on my Sav 110LH and keep shooting my tired old slow poke hand loads for $6 a box.
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Actually they might not.
You can't just consider the projectile wieght, but also have to consider the powder wieght.
If you had one load 180gr projectile along with 100gr of blackpowder to achieve 2000fps, and then you had a different load wit 180gr projectile with 15gr of powder kicking at 2000fps, then the one with 15gr would kick less.
You got to remember, the powder is being pushed out too. Its still mass. Just mass that turnes to hot gas.
You can't just consider the projectile wieght, but also have to consider the powder wieght.
If you had one load 180gr projectile along with 100gr of blackpowder to achieve 2000fps, and then you had a different load wit 180gr projectile with 15gr of powder kicking at 2000fps, then the one with 15gr would kick less.
You got to remember, the powder is being pushed out too. Its still mass. Just mass that turnes to hot gas.
#5
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
BC,
I'd have to believe that in the scenario that you've provided the mass of the powder would have to provide very little to felt recoil.
Also I can't get past that if you're still going the same 2000 fps that the same amount of energy had to be created and thus would recoil identically.
Not only does Hornady not compare the same velocities but they are saying you'll get more velocity.
Unless you provide additional proof I'm going to have to go with hawg wash.
Tom
I'd have to believe that in the scenario that you've provided the mass of the powder would have to provide very little to felt recoil.
Also I can't get past that if you're still going the same 2000 fps that the same amount of energy had to be created and thus would recoil identically.
Not only does Hornady not compare the same velocities but they are saying you'll get more velocity.
Unless you provide additional proof I'm going to have to go with hawg wash.
Tom
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
BC,
I'd have to believe that in the scenario that you've provided the mass of the powder would have to provide very little to felt recoil.
Also I can't get past that if you're still going the same 2000 fps that the same amount of energy had to be created and thus would recoil identically.
Not only does Hornady not compare the same velocities but they are saying you'll get more velocity.
Unless you provide additional proof I'm going to have to go with hawg wash.
Tom
I'd have to believe that in the scenario that you've provided the mass of the powder would have to provide very little to felt recoil.
Also I can't get past that if you're still going the same 2000 fps that the same amount of energy had to be created and thus would recoil identically.
Not only does Hornady not compare the same velocities but they are saying you'll get more velocity.
Unless you provide additional proof I'm going to have to go with hawg wash.
Tom
This page is very accurate. Play around with load and watch the significant drop
http://kwk.us/recoil.html
#8
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 604
BC,
I'd have to believe that in the scenario that you've provided the mass of the powder would have to provide very little to felt recoil.
Also I can't get past that if you're still going the same 2000 fps that the same amount of energy had to be created and thus would recoil identically.
Not only does Hornady not compare the same velocities but they are saying you'll get more velocity.
Unless you provide additional proof I'm going to have to go with hawg wash.
Tom
I'd have to believe that in the scenario that you've provided the mass of the powder would have to provide very little to felt recoil.
Also I can't get past that if you're still going the same 2000 fps that the same amount of energy had to be created and thus would recoil identically.
Not only does Hornady not compare the same velocities but they are saying you'll get more velocity.
Unless you provide additional proof I'm going to have to go with hawg wash.
Tom
If Hornady is getting the same velocity from a smaller powder charge then according to Newton the recoil will be less.
Here is a recoil calculator that you can plug in 2 different powder charges to see the change.
http://www.biggameinfo.com/RecoilCalc.aspx
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a