Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

30-30 or 35 rem

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-25-2009, 09:08 PM
  #1  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: East Texas
Posts: 70
Default 30-30 or 35 rem

Which do yall think would be best for thick east Texas hard woods and weeds
tcl632 is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 09:18 PM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
halfbakedi420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: central and east texas
Posts: 4,894
Default

i shoot both, and both r great, but the 35
halfbakedi420 is offline  
Old 11-25-2009, 09:30 PM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Sniper151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cornwall, Pa.
Posts: 1,720
Default

I agree, the 35 Rem is hard to beat as a brush gun.
Sniper151 is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 12:50 PM
  #4  
Giant Nontypical
 
Sheridan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 5,130
Default

I choose the .35 Rem.




http://www.marlinfirearms.com/firear...rfire/336C.asp
Sheridan is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 03:41 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
robbcayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 1,184
Default

I would go with the 30-30 due to cheap and available ammo. I'm not much for niche cartridges, and I've seen new marlin 30-30's for $300.
robbcayman is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 05:40 PM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
Centaur 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Titusville Florida
Posts: 1,727
Default

I have to choose the 30-30. The two cartridges are pretty close to each other in performance, but using leverevolution ammo you can squeak an extra 50 yards from the 30-30. I'm sure that it's different in parts of the country where the 35 is popular, but here in Florida you can't find ammo easily, 30-30's are everywhere.
Centaur 1 is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 06:03 PM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
TUK101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Spokane Washington
Posts: 1,042
Default

What are you going to be hunting? Both are a great beater brush gun. If all you are hunting are deer, then the 30-30 won't let you down and ammo is easy to come by. If you are going after anything larger then deer then stepping up to the 35 Remington gives you an extra bit of insurance.
TUK101 is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 07:16 PM
  #8  
Boone & Crockett
 
bronko22000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 12,762
Default

I'm with the majority. The 35 is ballistically superior to the 30-30.
bronko22000 is offline  
Old 11-27-2009, 08:57 AM
  #9  
Fork Horn
 
New York Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central New York
Posts: 271
Default

I've never shot a deer with a 30-30. I did shoot one with my 35 Rem. I shot it in the shoulder. It was a bang flop. It never took another step.

I think for deer hunting it probably doesn't matter. A little heavier game say black bear and/or wild boar, I'd go with the 35 Rem.
New York Hunter is offline  
Old 11-27-2009, 10:05 AM
  #10  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
Default

If those were the only two choices I would spend my money on the 30-30. The trajectory is better and the heavier bullet for the 35 Rem isn't going to move brush any better than the 30-30.

The brush gun is a myth.

Tom
statjunk is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.