Which of these two centerfire rifles would you suggest for my use?
#11
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well you're comparing 2 different things here......a .30-06 in a hunting rifle configuration, and a .308 in a varmint set up, which would be a better target setup, ie more weight....heavier barrel.
Since you stated mainly or only target shooting? I think the answer is clear, the .308, which is much more known as a target round than the .30-06, also its in more of a target rifle setup!
But now if you do plan to do more hunting, I am partial to the .30-06 over the .308, though both aparently can do great and most ranges. I was surprised to see how much energy the .308 had out to 500yds.
Also I think those rifles may be less than 800, isn't MSRP 800? or 750? so take another $100 off of that price?
Less you hate synthetics CZ makes a 550 varmint kevlar in .308 which IMO is better looking than the wood version, something you may consider.
You may ask for suggestions of other rifles in .30-06, I'm trying to think who else makes a nice .30-06 like you may want.....someone else may have some suggestions out there for you. I think though you're running into the problem of a .30-06 almost being exclusively used to hunt with, vs. target shoot with, whereas the .308 has been used for target, varmints, bigger game, I think you can find a .308 in a target setup much more easily than you can a .30-06.
Still wondering why you want a .30-06 so badly after all you want to target shoot? Do tell use more....less you plan to use it for more hunting/certain types of hunts?
Since you stated mainly or only target shooting? I think the answer is clear, the .308, which is much more known as a target round than the .30-06, also its in more of a target rifle setup!
But now if you do plan to do more hunting, I am partial to the .30-06 over the .308, though both aparently can do great and most ranges. I was surprised to see how much energy the .308 had out to 500yds.
Also I think those rifles may be less than 800, isn't MSRP 800? or 750? so take another $100 off of that price?
Less you hate synthetics CZ makes a 550 varmint kevlar in .308 which IMO is better looking than the wood version, something you may consider.
You may ask for suggestions of other rifles in .30-06, I'm trying to think who else makes a nice .30-06 like you may want.....someone else may have some suggestions out there for you. I think though you're running into the problem of a .30-06 almost being exclusively used to hunt with, vs. target shoot with, whereas the .308 has been used for target, varmints, bigger game, I think you can find a .308 in a target setup much more easily than you can a .30-06.
Still wondering why you want a .30-06 so badly after all you want to target shoot? Do tell use more....less you plan to use it for more hunting/certain types of hunts?
#12
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Still wondering why you want a .30-06 so badly after all you want to target shoot? Do tell use more....less you plan to use it for more hunting/certain types of hunts?
#13
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok, I realized that the varmint will be better for my purposes. And yes these guns will be less than 700, because their retail is mid 700s. As for synthetic stocks, I'm not a big fan. If the varmint was in 30-06, that would have been ideal. And I don't want to do any after market barrel work to change it, so considering all this I will take everyone's advice and stick with the Varmint.
Here is why I initially wanted a .30-06
1) More power at longer distances
2) I can handle recoil without much problem (strong shoulder
), and like Briman said I think shooting is more fun with recoil. I've shot .22 Lrs and it gets so boring because I can shoot them one handed and it feels like a kid's rifle.
3) So my bullets look bigger and cooler than my friend's .308 bullets![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
4) It's more fun loading a round with a longer action IMO.
Despite that, I think i'll go with .308 Varmint because that seems to be the consensus where I ask this question. I'll have to see which local dealers give me the best price. After that is bought, I'll have to send a few weeks online going on forums and asking about which optics are ideal in the 150-300 range.
Here is why I initially wanted a .30-06
1) More power at longer distances
2) I can handle recoil without much problem (strong shoulder
![](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/image/s2.gif)
3) So my bullets look bigger and cooler than my friend's .308 bullets
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
4) It's more fun loading a round with a longer action IMO.
Despite that, I think i'll go with .308 Varmint because that seems to be the consensus where I ask this question. I'll have to see which local dealers give me the best price. After that is bought, I'll have to send a few weeks online going on forums and asking about which optics are ideal in the 150-300 range.
#14
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: msmforever69
.
Here is why I initially wanted a .30-06
1) More power at longer distances
2) I can handle recoil without much problem (strong shoulder
), and like Briman said I think shooting is more fun with recoil. I've shot .22 Lrs and it gets so boring because I can shoot them one handed and it feels like a kid's rifle.
3) So my bullets look bigger and cooler than my friend's .308 bullets![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
4) It's more fun loading a round with a longer action IMO.
.
Here is why I initially wanted a .30-06
1) More power at longer distances
2) I can handle recoil without much problem (strong shoulder
![Big Grin](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
3) So my bullets look bigger and cooler than my friend's .308 bullets
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
4) It's more fun loading a round with a longer action IMO.
2) To each thier own when it's recoil. As with #1, it's shot placement not recoil that a prospective buyer should be concerned with.
3) Same bullets, different cases/cartridges. If it's the attempt to look cooler
![EEK!](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/eek.gif)
4) Someone is hung up on size andthevisual again.
![Frown](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/frown.gif)
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#17
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
.300 win mag isn't available on the CZ 550 American, and even though I want recoil a good amount of recoil, i think the .300 mag would be just a bit more than what I'm looking for. I realize that a .308 and .30-06 are the same bullet almost, however for an uniformed shooter a .30-06 would seem like the "bigger" bullet comapred to .308 because of the larger case. So for my buddies who think shooting stuff is cool, and aren't too informed about bullet calibers, the .30-06 being the visually larger bullet will get more "ooohs and ahhhs and wows". To the uninformed a .270 win mag would appear to be a "bigger/more powerful" bullet than the .308 winchester because of the short casing. And yes Maine Shooter, size and visual are important. Spending 700 plus is a significant amount of change for me because I'm a college student, so if I'm spending 700 I want to make sure I get something that is visually appealing in addition to functionality and accuracy. But I can live with the .308 CZ 550 Varmint, Since it's probably not a good idea to spend a day at the range with the 550 American in .30-06.
But if I had the gigantic .30-06 cartridge, It's more likely at the range would
.
But if I had the gigantic .30-06 cartridge, It's more likely at the range would
![](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/upfiles/smiley/hail.gif)
#18
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Get something like a .223 or .243 at the most if you are only shooting targets....
The .243 could double as a good deer rifle as well...If you get bored from lack of recoil, try shooting that '06 from your "off" shoulder, video it as well, I need another good laugh...
I did get a good laugh out of you thinking a .22 is a kids rifls...I've killed about 30 deer with a .22...It's actually an "experts" rifle...![Big Grin](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
The .243 could double as a good deer rifle as well...If you get bored from lack of recoil, try shooting that '06 from your "off" shoulder, video it as well, I need another good laugh...
I did get a good laugh out of you thinking a .22 is a kids rifls...I've killed about 30 deer with a .22...It's actually an "experts" rifle...
![Big Grin](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#19
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: msmforever69
.I realize that a .308 and .30-06 are the same bullet almost, however for an uniformed shooter a .30-06 would seem like the "bigger" bullet comapred to .308 because of the larger case. So for my buddies who think shooting stuff is cool, and aren't too informed about bullet calibers, the .30-06 being the visually larger bullet will get more "ooohs and ahhhs and wows". To the uninformed a .270 win mag would appear to be a "bigger/more powerful" bullet than the .308 winchester because of the short casing.
.I realize that a .308 and .30-06 are the same bullet almost, however for an uniformed shooter a .30-06 would seem like the "bigger" bullet comapred to .308 because of the larger case. So for my buddies who think shooting stuff is cool, and aren't too informed about bullet calibers, the .30-06 being the visually larger bullet will get more "ooohs and ahhhs and wows". To the uninformed a .270 win mag would appear to be a "bigger/more powerful" bullet than the .308 winchester because of the short casing.
Color me different but I'd rather have performance or function over pretty and machismo-boosting ooohs, ahhhs and wows anyday. To each thier own. happy recoil!
#20
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This thread is absolutely amazing!
I'd give ooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhs and aaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhs at the range for someone that can lay out some impressive groups, not someone that shoots a 30-06 because of its LOOOOONG MASCULINE case.....![EEK!](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/eek.gif)
My vote would be for the Varmint in 204, 223, or 22-250 if you just going to be punching paper out to 300 yards.
I'd give ooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhs and aaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhs at the range for someone that can lay out some impressive groups, not someone that shoots a 30-06 because of its LOOOOONG MASCULINE case.....
![EEK!](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/eek.gif)
My vote would be for the Varmint in 204, 223, or 22-250 if you just going to be punching paper out to 300 yards.