Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-04-2008, 04:17 PM
  #11  
Typical Buck
 
Tuco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Indiana (southern)
Posts: 873
Default RE: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

Well, I will make a guess....the 22-250????
Tuco is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 04:19 PM
  #12  
 
Retaks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 2,313
Default RE: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

IM going to say the 270.
Retaks is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 04:47 PM
  #13  
Spike
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Midland County, MI
Posts: 38
Default RE: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

I'm going to pick one of the .22 caliber choices. It could go either way based on bullet weight, construction, and velocity at impact.

I am going to say that for the same reason tornadoes or certain other strong winds can drive pieces of straw into telephone poles. In layman's terms, when the phone pole is pushed on by the straw, it attempts to push back. The straw simply pushes too suddenly against the phone pole to for it to "push back", so it penetrates.
the_sandman_454 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 04:48 PM
  #14  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,476
Default RE: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

220 Swift?
8mm/06 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 05:07 PM
  #15  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: MB.
Posts: 2,984
Default RE: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

My choice would be 6 mm being very close to the 6.5 for deep penetration...
trailer is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 05:56 PM
  #16  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
cjwink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: From Texas but now reside in MS
Posts: 823
Default RE: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

The 220 swift was the only one to go all the way thru... In fact it was going so fast when it went thru that both the front and back of the steel was peeled back as though it had exited both sides. It was amazing.. Any guess on which one "Almost went thru"
cjwink is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 06:12 PM
  #17  
 
wyotimberghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WYO
Posts: 2,298
Default RE: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

Dangit I was just going to post the 220 Swift as my guess but you already posted the answer. I talked to the guy at the rifle range here one time and he said by far the most damaging cartridges for the metal silhouette targets were the high velocity .22's and other similar cartidges (like 6mm's pushing light bullets at high speed).

My guess for the second part is the 22-250.

I think bullet construction should be mentioned in this post, though, since you are talking about penetration. I'd bet all of the cartidges would have punched through your metal plate if you had chosen a bullet constructed to penetrate deeper than simple soft points.
wyotimberghost is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 08:04 PM
  #18  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
Default RE: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

If you want to know what they will do to muscle and bone, kill 5-6 deer with each....
nchawkeye is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 09:12 PM
  #19  
Giant Nontypical
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default RE: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

.458 Lott w/ solids ? I bet this would go through 3/4" of steel.

.375 H&H w/ 300gr solids....?

my .340 wby with cheap/soft bullets went through 1/4" of steel, then 3-4" of timber, then through another 1/4" of steel.


salukipv1 is offline  
Old 02-04-2008, 09:14 PM
  #20  
Giant Nontypical
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default RE: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration

what calibers/ bullets were tested?
salukipv1 is offline  


Quick Reply: Let's discuss Bullet Penetration


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.