Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Ruger super redhawk vs alaskan

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-07-2008, 11:56 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 38
Default Ruger super redhawk vs alaskan

Was looking at a pistol to carry (lower 48) while bowhunting mainly but might use to hunt also. mainly encounter black bears and wolves are my concerns, possible mt. lion also but rare. is the 44 mag good or 454 casull better; any comments. looking at ruger super redhawk with 7.5 inch barrrell or the alaskan
bluffhunter is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:30 PM
  #2  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
Posts: 809
Default RE: Ruger super redhawk vs alaskan

Depending on how recoil shy you are is the most important question to answer. You diffenently want something your not afraid to shoot to stay on your target. If you decide which way you are going, give me an e-mail I have alike new in the case Super Redhawk in 44mag 7 1/2 Stainless Steel forsale if interested $525 shipped. [email protected]
RugerMike is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 05:54 PM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default RE: Ruger super redhawk vs alaskan

I have nothing against overkill, I've been guilty of it myself a time or two! But, I'd go with the .44 Mag. It is plenty of gun to do the job. I would also choose the Super Redhawk if you are going to use it for hunting. The Alaskan is usually used as an un-scoped backup gun.
JagMagMan is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 08:30 PM
  #4  
EKM
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 599
Default RE: Ruger super redhawk vs alaskan

I also have nothing against "overkill" however I think I'dlean towards the 44 Mag also. I havea 44 Magin a stainless Redhawk, shorter than 7.5".... easy carry, not too heavy, warm and cuddly, not the most.... but it is a lot.

If I was going to specifically pursue Moose or Elk in a pistol hunt then I'd look at the S&W 500, but that is like carrying a mini-rifle.
EKM is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 08:34 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mn.
Posts: 3,399
Default RE: Ruger super redhawk vs alaskan

I would go with the 44mag,its not like youll be going up against a 1000 pound griz....Check your state regs,Where I live you cant carry a sidearm or CCW while bowhunting the only way you can is if your bowhunting bear,then you can carry a backup.
ranger56528 is offline  
Old 01-07-2008, 10:27 PM
  #6  
 
VT Outdoorsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 213
Default RE: Ruger super redhawk vs alaskan

I beleive that the alaskan is only availible in something like a 3.5 inch barrel..something to consider if you do/do not want a short pistol.
VT Outdoorsman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
damascusblade5
Guns
0
01-24-2009 01:31 PM
bluffhunter
Big Game Hunting
4
01-08-2008 09:00 AM
Bassdeer
Guns
0
01-03-2007 07:41 AM
James B
Guns
4
02-20-2005 08:26 AM
schunter270
Firearm Review Forum
10
09-29-2004 06:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Ruger super redhawk vs alaskan


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.