Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Kimber Montana Question

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-14-2007, 11:33 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 125
Default Kimber Montana Question

Any kimber Montana owners out there? On paper, I love this rifle. It’s the perfect mountain rifle: lightweight, ss/s, hidden mag, easy to handle (from inside a store). However, I really hate the stock. It seems a bit awkward, and very slick, like it may fly out of your hands in the heat of battle. Especially w/ gloves and in a snow storm.

So my question, are you happy with it? I am wanting a 270 WSM for ‘lopes and sheep. My current go-to is a Sako 75 Finnlight 300WSM which I will carry to my grave, If Sako would offer a hinged floor plate I would look into that, but there is something about a kimber that I cant get out of my blood, plus I need a new gun.

starhunter21 is offline  
Old 12-14-2007, 12:46 PM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,970
Default RE: Kimber Montana Question

I too love my Kimber 84M. It's not, however, a Montana. The stock turned me off completely, plus I dislike blind magazines. My wooden stocked version has very nice wood, hinged floor plate and shoots well. I topped it with a 3-9 Swaro AV. It a great mix. Good luck.
bugsNbows is offline  
Old 12-14-2007, 01:21 PM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: Kimber Montana Question

Any kimber Montana owners out there? On paper, I love this rifle. It’s the perfect mountain rifle: lightweight, ss/s, hidden mag, easy to handle (from inside a store). However, I really hate the stock. It seems a bit awkward, and very slick, like it may fly out of your hands in the heat of battle. Especially w/ gloves and in a snow storm.

It is too light for my tastes by about 1/2 lb..the stock has too much flex in the foreend for a supposedly lightweight stock and it has no provision for a magazine or floorplate. They are also glass bedded to a master receiver and the pillar bedding is skimpy at best, your action will fall out of the stock rather easily . I have had the 84M and it had to be rebuilt by Kimber when the stock warped, the bolt was almost impossible to smooth up even though I tried to work the action while watching TV nor would it feed 7mm-08 cartridges correctly . In 2 weeks time a new stock , Floorplate(allen screws) and a bolt shroud later it was as it ought to have left the factory in the first place. . Afriend has a Montana in 300 wsm and it is much nicer build then my 84m but has some disadvantages as I outlined previously. The 300 wsm has a pretty fierce recoil in his rifle and he is mentioning muzzle brake since he has developed a pretty good flinch. I don't think I'll touch a kimber again , they have quality control problems. I can look at 6 montanas sitting on the rack at my local Gander mountain and all six will have a different finish on the paint ranging from smooth to sandpaper and all have different shades of Grey. COmpared to my Finnright in 300 wsm it feels like a real POS. FWIW the 8400 or 84M woodstocked guns seem to be more consistent qualitywise.

oldelkhunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldelkhunter
Guns
11
07-12-2008 06:33 AM
schoolcraft
Guns
3
06-22-2008 04:14 PM
nebhunt
Firearm Review Forum
4
10-11-2007 01:32 AM
SalCucco
Guns
13
12-18-2005 02:33 PM
UTICA
Firearm Review Forum
10
01-11-2005 11:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Kimber Montana Question


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.