257 vs 243
#31
RE: 257 vs 243
ORIGINAL: Briman
-Would have to be fired in a AR-10 (much heavier than an AR-15) or another battle rifle already chambered in .308 leading to either a weight or versatily issue in comparison to the AR-15.
-Would have to be fired in a AR-10 (much heavier than an AR-15) or another battle rifle already chambered in .308 leading to either a weight or versatily issue in comparison to the AR-15.
#32
RE: 257 vs 243
Doesn't DPMS make an AR-15 based .243?
FWIW though, you can buy a .50 BMG upper for an AR-15, though the rifle would be a single shot.
#33
RE: 257 vs 243
ORIGINAL: Briman
It would be an AR-10. A .308 case will fit in a AR-15 magazine with about 1/4" to spare,the AR-15 just isn't long enough for a .308 parent case.
Doesn't DPMS make an AR-15 based .243?
http://www.dpmsinc.com/store/products/?prod=1998
#34
RE: 257 vs 243
ORIGINAL: ipscshooter
Sure looks like an AR15 to me.
http://www.dpmsinc.com/store/products/?prod=1998
ORIGINAL: Briman
It would be an AR-10. A .308 case will fit in a AR-15 magazine with about 1/4" to spare,the AR-15 just isn't long enough for a .308 parent case.
Doesn't DPMS make an AR-15 based .243?
http://www.dpmsinc.com/store/products/?prod=1998