Sighting in .270
#11
RE: Sighting in .270
ORIGINAL: HighBall5
Thanks, I am using the Core lokt ammo actually. I sighted it in today. It was about 1 inch high at 50yds, but it looked more like 4 inches high at 100.
Could this be correct or do you think that my hold was off?
Thanks, I am using the Core lokt ammo actually. I sighted it in today. It was about 1 inch high at 50yds, but it looked more like 4 inches high at 100.
Could this be correct or do you think that my hold was off?
For the majority of my hunting when my 270 was on deck I sighted in + 2.5" @ 100with 130gr pills which allowed me to hold fast to 300 yards without worrying about hold over.
#12
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Sighting in .270
Read all of the ballistics tables you want.Then sight the rifle in at whatever height above zero you choose at 100 yards,be it 1-1/2" high or 2" high.Then shoot the rifle at 200 yards and then 300 yards and you will know for sure exactly where the point of impact is.Ballistics programs and tables are only theory,and blindly trusting them has resulted in many people wounding or missing game.
#13
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 218
RE: Sighting in .270
Absolutely, positively, irresponsible to shoot at a range you have not practiced at. You wanna shoot 500 yards take a few hundred shots on a 500 yard target.
Ballistics charts are pure math on very specific gun configurations. Stated ballistics seldom match when chronographed. Scope height, average temperature, barrel manufacture, and a whole bunch of other things cause stated ballistics not to be true. I have way too many holes in my 100 yard shooting house that came from people whoCALCULATED their shot.
Anybody out there that can calculate where a bullet will hit every time, call NASA, they have been looking for you.
Ballistics charts are pure math on very specific gun configurations. Stated ballistics seldom match when chronographed. Scope height, average temperature, barrel manufacture, and a whole bunch of other things cause stated ballistics not to be true. I have way too many holes in my 100 yard shooting house that came from people whoCALCULATED their shot.
Anybody out there that can calculate where a bullet will hit every time, call NASA, they have been looking for you.
#14
RE: Sighting in .270
I wholeheartedly agree that the ONLY way to know for SURE EXACTLY where your specific setup is going to impact,you have to shoot it at ranges in question. The ballistic programs are kinda like boresighting the way I see it-they'll get you on paper. There's a lot of variables on dimensions/tolerances to predict individual rifles' performance.
#15
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Taking the high ground.....
Posts: 277
RE: Sighting in .270
ORIGINAL: Ideaman
Absolutely, positively, irresponsible to shoot at a range you have not practiced at. You wanna shoot 500 yards take a few hundred shots on a 500 yard target.
Absolutely, positively, irresponsible to shoot at a range you have not practiced at. You wanna shoot 500 yards take a few hundred shots on a 500 yard target.
Pun there.......
#16
RE: Sighting in .270
ORIGINAL: HighBall5
I bought a .270 savage with a 3x9 nikon monarch scope. Does anyone know the ballistics on this? Im shooting 130grain bullets.
I was thinking 50yds, that way it will shoot a little high at 100 and right on at 200?
I bought a .270 savage with a 3x9 nikon monarch scope. Does anyone know the ballistics on this? Im shooting 130grain bullets.
I was thinking 50yds, that way it will shoot a little high at 100 and right on at 200?
The last .270 M/S was one I bought in 1964. After mounting a Lyman Alll-American 4X fixed-power scope on it and zeroing it in 1964, every year after that I'd fire ONE ROUND each fall to check the rifle's zero before hunting with that rifle. I sold it in 1987, and when I sold it, it was still shooting to the exact same POI it was zeroed for in 1964! In all those years, it NEVER CHANGED zero - what a dummy I was for parting with that rifle!!!
#17
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Sighting in .270
The hard part to get folks to understand is that the results they give are only as accurate as the information they are fed.
You must know a few things to get good results
exact velocity
ballistic coefficient ( your actual BC, not the manufactures published BC)
exact heigth of site from bore center to center
You must know a few things to get good results
exact velocity
ballistic coefficient ( your actual BC, not the manufactures published BC)
exact heigth of site from bore center to center
#19
RE: Sighting in .270
ORIGINAL: HighBall5
Thanks, I am using the Core lokt ammo actually. I sighted it in today. It was about 1 inch high at 50yds, but it looked more like 4 inches high at 100.
Could this be correct or do you think that my hold was off?
Thanks, I am using the Core lokt ammo actually. I sighted it in today. It was about 1 inch high at 50yds, but it looked more like 4 inches high at 100.
Could this be correct or do you think that my hold was off?
I never missed by overshooting with a zero that was +4" @ 100 and the same at 200. However, I believe anything that hits muchabove +4" at 100 and200 will have a maximum ordinate of+6" or perhaps more, and that's enough to cause midrange misses.
#20
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Sighting in .270
exactly stubble, but once you have it figured out its pretty easy to build a reliable drop chart, The last one I worked with I did the measuring of the scope heigth, chrony'd the velocity and printed out a chart for an alt of 2800 ft and bar pressure of 29.6.
went shooting and dialed my scope to the chart for 660 yrds, group was 1.5" above POA, went home and tweaked the published BC, and that put it right on.
went shooting and dialed my scope to the chart for 660 yrds, group was 1.5" above POA, went home and tweaked the published BC, and that put it right on.