300 win mag deer rifle?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,813
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The big down side to buying a higher recoiling rifle with expensive ammo is, you won't practise with it as much as you should!
No matter what you buy, you should spend a lot of time practiseing with it!
DM
No matter what you buy, you should spend a lot of time practiseing with it!
DM
#12
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: buckmastr229
How is the 300 win mag? good or no good? im thinking about buying it for a deer rifle. this is what i want Thompson Center Arms Encore Rifle SST 26" 300 Win Mag , do they come with scope mounts or no? another question
How is the 300 win mag? good or no good? im thinking about buying it for a deer rifle. this is what i want Thompson Center Arms Encore Rifle SST 26" 300 Win Mag , do they come with scope mounts or no? another question
#13
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,395
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 300-win mag is a great all-around choice.
I hunted antelope, whitetail, mule deer & elk with one rifle for several years. The rifle is a Ruger M-77 chambered in 300-win mag.
For the last 8-years I have been adding to my rifle collection. I have been buying rifles to match the game I hunt.
25-06 for antelope.
7mm-STW for deer & elk hunting in the open country.
300-win mag for hunting elk in the timber.
338-06 another elk rifle in a light weight easy to carry package.
If I could do it again? I wouldjustkeep my 300-win mag. I have not made my life eaiser, I have added more confusion.
I hunted antelope, whitetail, mule deer & elk with one rifle for several years. The rifle is a Ruger M-77 chambered in 300-win mag.
For the last 8-years I have been adding to my rifle collection. I have been buying rifles to match the game I hunt.
25-06 for antelope.
7mm-STW for deer & elk hunting in the open country.
300-win mag for hunting elk in the timber.
338-06 another elk rifle in a light weight easy to carry package.
If I could do it again? I wouldjustkeep my 300-win mag. I have not made my life eaiser, I have added more confusion.
#14
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,553
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree with the feedback so far. I bought a Savage 114 American Classic in .300 win mag this year and plan to use it in a blind for longer shots during rifle opener. I have shot about a 120 shots or there about through it to break in the barrel and sight in. It has a laminated stock and fairly good weight. I also put a medium sized slip on simms recoil pad over the paper thin stock pad and it has made a huge difference in perceived/felt recoil. I have been shooting 165 and 180 grns through it. It has a good kick, but I have gotten 1" groups out of it consistently and as long as I relax, no flinch of any sort.
Not the ideal gun fo whitetails and not close to my first rifle. There are many more appropriate calibers, but if you want to use it or have not choice but to use it, use it.
Practice, practice, practice....
Not the ideal gun fo whitetails and not close to my first rifle. There are many more appropriate calibers, but if you want to use it or have not choice but to use it, use it.
Practice, practice, practice....
#15
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A lot of good points and I agree with at least some of them. Probably the first point is made by DM I can't shoot most 300 Win Mags without uncomfortable recoil. Guess what? after 50 years of shooting, I don't like recoil all that much. This is not a few shots in the field but an hour or two at the bench is out of the question. The old shoulder won't take what the young shoulder would.
Next point is that many consider the 30-06 to be a very good all around big game rifle. I agree but the 300 Win Mag is a bit more versitils yet and other that adding 3-5 lbs of recoil, its hard to argue that it is not at least as good as the 06 for all around hunting. Of course this line of thinking would never end. If the 300 Win. is a great all aroud cartridge, then would not the 300 Weatherby which adds another 150 fps or so be even better? Of course this would make the 30-378 even better? It comes down to how much pain do you enjoy.
I could live with having the 300 Win Mag as my own MAX for deer. With the Shooters Friend recoil pad, I could even handle a little practice with it. It would however, for recoil, be the absolute Max for me. I would also add that for deer, it would be no more effective than my 7MM-08. Or my wife's much loved 250 Savage.
Next point is that many consider the 30-06 to be a very good all around big game rifle. I agree but the 300 Win Mag is a bit more versitils yet and other that adding 3-5 lbs of recoil, its hard to argue that it is not at least as good as the 06 for all around hunting. Of course this line of thinking would never end. If the 300 Win. is a great all aroud cartridge, then would not the 300 Weatherby which adds another 150 fps or so be even better? Of course this would make the 30-378 even better? It comes down to how much pain do you enjoy.
I could live with having the 300 Win Mag as my own MAX for deer. With the Shooters Friend recoil pad, I could even handle a little practice with it. It would however, for recoil, be the absolute Max for me. I would also add that for deer, it would be no more effective than my 7MM-08. Or my wife's much loved 250 Savage.
#16
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There is no doubt that the 300wm is a great choice for hunting species including deer,elk and moose.However,if I was only going to hunt deer,I would not be using any .308" bullet as it simply isn't required.
#17
Fork Horn
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 154
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've been using a 300WM as a deer rifle for 8 years and it is a little much for a "deer only" rifle. Recoil, muzzle blast, weight/length of rifle (oftentimes) and cost of ammo are all increased for gains in performance.
Next year I'll be seriously considering a 25-06. Quite a few people have recommended it and it seems like a more sensible choice.
Next year I'll be seriously considering a 25-06. Quite a few people have recommended it and it seems like a more sensible choice.
#18
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Baileysville, WV
Posts: 2,925
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
With that Shooters Friend pad even 300 recoil is pretty tolerable. If you can stand the recoil I imagine it would make about a perffect all around gun....just like James said..how much pain can ya stand.
#19
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
just like James said..how much pain can ya stand
![EEK!](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#20
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: Chris W.
If most of your hunting is in areas where shots will seldom be over 250 yards, a standard long action caliber will serve you just as well without the added recoil and muzzle blast.
If most of your hunting is in areas where shots will seldom be over 250 yards, a standard long action caliber will serve you just as well without the added recoil and muzzle blast.