Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-09-2006, 07:48 AM
  #21  
Giant Nontypical
 
eldeguello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Posts: 6,270
Default RE: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

ORIGINAL: buckstalker1187

And then there are some that claim that its not a powerfull enough round to even take deer with it. Looking at ballistic charts of the 30-30. The trajectory and energyin footpounds, leads me to assume that the 30-30 can still be deadly for deer from 150 - 180 yards.
What do you guys think? How far would you shoot at a deer with a 30-30?
Just curious.
I know people who have killed grizzly bears, moose,and elk with factory-loaded .30/30 ammo.

I would take shots with it up to at least 200 yards, if I had the right sights on a .30/30, and a good shot was presented. With me, the limiting factorin .30/30 shooting would be the pretty awful open sights that one usually finds on them. Not the performance of the cartridge.
eldeguello is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 08:03 AM
  #22  
Giant Nontypical
 
eldeguello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Posts: 6,270
Default RE: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

ORIGINAL: Pawildman

I think the general "rule of thumb" indicates you need 1000 lbs. of energy to cleanly kill a deer. At what yardage does the 30-30 fall below that figure? I guess that would be the number you're looking for..........
It is true that many "experts" say you need 1000 ft/lb to kill a deer, and now some have raised this figure to 1200 ft/lb. Basically, this is very poor advice, because it does not take into account bullet construction, impact velocity,bullet diameter, nor shot placement. For example, a .500" diameterround ball from a muzzleloader will kill deer pretty effectively at 100 yards, at which range it only delivers around 450 to 500ft/lb. Of course, to accomplish this, it has to hit in the right spot, BUT THAT IS TRUE OF ANY BULLET, REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF FT/LB IT IS CARRYING WHEN IT HITS! A near-miss with a 600 Nitro will not kill a deer any better than a near-miuss with a .22 short!

If the "experts" were to describe the type of bullet which needs 1000 ft/lb to kill a deer in terms of construction,weight, diameter, and the impact velocity range needed, then the idea of specifying the number of foot-pounds the bullet must have to kill a deer, or whatever, then the concept would be a lot more valid! For example "to produce clean kills on deer, 1000ft/lb of impact energy is required for bullets between .243" and .323" diameter of cup and draw, softpoint construction, that srike the deer at between the velocities of 2000 and 2900 FPS." Now, this kind of a statement might be more valid-perhaps!!
eldeguello is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 08:12 AM
  #23  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,785
Default RE: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

I believe ray1301 hit the nail on the head. "Know your limits." I killed several deer with a 30/30 this past season, and they were all while hunting in the woods where shots would be under 100 yards. I also killed a couple of deer and hogs with my 300 WSM, but I didn't take my 30/30 where I knew a 300+ yard shot might present itself. The key is knowing your limits as a shooter, and the effective ranges of the weapons that you take afield.
retrieverman is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 08:19 AM
  #24  
Giant Nontypical
 
eldeguello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Posts: 6,270
Default RE: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

ORIGINAL: buckstalker1187

This is one of the reasons that makes me wonder why people will take very long shots with yet another famous 30 caliber ( 300 win mag)

In other words, if a 30-30 has slightly less than enough energy to kill deer at 200 yards. It would seem that a 300 win mag would have far far less energy than what is needed to kill elk at 700 yards.

I just wonder if the guys that wont take 150 yard shots at deer with a 30-30would take 700 yard shots at an elk with their 300 win mags ?

Alot of hunters that I know personally always nock the 30-30 and 30-06. I wonder why some people think that their magnums are limitless to the distance that they can take game at. (I know one guy that claims he would shoot a deer at 1.5 miles away with his 7mm ultra mag.) In my opinion he is stupid thinking that there would be enough energy left to even kill a deer at 1.5 miles away.
let's see.... A .30/30 delivers 944 ft/lb of energy at 200 yards, so it is 56 ft/lb shy of being able to kill a deer at that distance.... But, if we could increase its velocity at 200 yards by 10 fps and thereby give it 1001 ft/lb at that range, then it would kill the deer..... RIGHT!!

Actually, 300 magnum provides a .30-caliber bullet with perhaps a 50 - 100 yard range advantage over the .30/'06, depending on how high the respecive bullets' B.C.'s happen to be. It is even possible for the '06 to deliver MORE energy at extreme ranges than the magnum, if the '06 is usinga better bullet, even if it is launching said bullet at a couple of hundred fps less to start with.

The possession of a magnum chambering does not make one a long-range marksman capable of cleanly killing an elk at 700 yards... Only constant practice at such ranges allow this kind of shooting, regardless of the caliber of the weapon being used!
eldeguello is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 08:25 AM
  #25  
Giant Nontypical
 
eldeguello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Posts: 6,270
Default RE: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

ORIGINAL: DANTHEHUNTER

I have often wondered want people would say about the old 30-30 if it wre in a bolt rifle with a full lenght barrel and some good lead.
Well, the Savage 340 was available in .30/30 as well as .22 Hornet and .222 Remington. In addition, Winchester used to make a Modle 54 in .30/30, and that was a pretty strong rifle in which pointed bullets could be used.....
eldeguello is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 10:14 AM
  #26  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: S Texas
Posts: 1,037
Default RE: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

Well, the Savage 340 was available in .30/30 as well as .22 Hornet and .222 Remington. In addition, Winchester used to make a Modle 54 in .30/30,
The Savage and Stevens boltguns wererwhat I had in mind when I mentioned bolt action .30/30s. Most people I know who have one aren't inerested in selling it! I know Winchester built 54s in .30/30, and planned to produce it in the model 70 as well, but dropped the idea. I've never seen a model 54 in .30/30 myself, and don't know how many were made.
Charley is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 10:59 AM
  #27  
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,474
Default RE: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

The Remington 788 was also chambered in 30-30. I had a Savage pump 30-30 but if I recall correctly it still had a tubular magazine. The 788 had a clip. I never had one of those in 30-30 but I saw some. They also chambered in in 44 Mag.
James B is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 11:57 AM
  #28  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 422
Default RE: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

My 30-30 has killed many deer but I have never tried to use it out past 110 yds or so. Open sights so that is about my limit. The cool thing about it is that the POI (with my '94) is the same at 100 yds. for 150gr or 170gr so I don't have to worry about re-sighting the rifle in if I'm going to change loads.
kelbro is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 02:47 PM
  #29  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: mt. airy nc USA
Posts: 572
Default RE: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

What yawl think about hornadays new 30-30 bullets.


martinfaw is offline  
Old 03-10-2006, 04:53 PM
  #30  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MISSOURI
Posts: 1,157
Default RE: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30

Now take it out of that 18 in. barrel, Put it in a 22 in or 24 in I would bet it would be alot more talked about. No I dont own a 30-30 but It has been here for along time so something is right about it. I can imagine that back in the day having a 30-30 and a 45/70 you probably felt like you had it all.
DANTHEHUNTER is offline  


Quick Reply: hearing mixed fealings about the 30-30


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.