Which Leopold scope
07-27-2005, 06:00 AM
#11
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Which Leopold scope
Many times, not having to look thru the smaller scope will help your shooting considerably.
07-27-2005, 08:47 PM
#13
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,293
RE: Which Leopold scope
I will agree with the others. With the newer scopes and coated optics, especially the high end ones 40mm should be plenty. I don't think you would be able to effectively use the extra light a bigger scope would have. If you were going with a much higher power it might be a consideration, but not at that power. Like said, I think a high end compact 32 mm would even work well.
I have an alaskan guide model 6.5x20 in a 44mm and it is plenty. And it doesn't hold a candle to 600-1000+ dollar plus scopes in clarity. I mean it is pretty darn nice for a sub $400 scope (370 something I think?). But when you step up to the next price range there is a noticable difference. At least there was to me when I looked at them.
Paul
I have an alaskan guide model 6.5x20 in a 44mm and it is plenty. And it doesn't hold a candle to 600-1000+ dollar plus scopes in clarity. I mean it is pretty darn nice for a sub $400 scope (370 something I think?). But when you step up to the next price range there is a noticable difference. At least there was to me when I looked at them.
Paul
07-27-2005, 11:13 PM
#14
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,052
RE: Which Leopold scope
This will be an age old arguement but IMHO when talking about a 3x9 or smaller scope, the 40 is as big as you will need. The 50 does present mounting "concerns" (wont call them a problem as it's simply a matter of taller rings) but there is a point of diminishing returns. I DO however think there is a time and place for a 50mm bell and that is when dealing with scopes of 12 or larger power. They need the extra width in the pupil that a 50 gives. A 9x does not. When looking at ANY type scope to be considered for dark situations, simply divide the objective lense (in MMs) by the power and the number you end up with will be the metric size of the scopes pupil (just like your eye). Ideally you want something in the 3.5-5mm range with 4-4.5 being about as good as you need for a hunting scope.
THIS is why European scopes of high magnification have 30mm tubes and 56mm bells on them. They need the moonlight gathered (they hunt alot at night) when the scope is cranked on up there. That's not a consideration for a 9x being used stateside (at least not to the legal hunter, hehehe).
If you are just SWORN too the most without high rings, then look to Nikon or Zeiss Conquest and check out their 44mm line. Thats about as big a scope as you will put in medium rings!
RA
THIS is why European scopes of high magnification have 30mm tubes and 56mm bells on them. They need the moonlight gathered (they hunt alot at night) when the scope is cranked on up there. That's not a consideration for a 9x being used stateside (at least not to the legal hunter, hehehe).
If you are just SWORN too the most without high rings, then look to Nikon or Zeiss Conquest and check out their 44mm line. Thats about as big a scope as you will put in medium rings!
RA
