Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

.243 vs 6mm remington

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-28-2005, 07:39 PM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
Sniper151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cornwall, Pa.
Posts: 1,720
Default RE: .243 vs 6mm remington

The are few calibers with more consitant accuracy than the 22 LR, 6mm Rem. and 308 Win. My opinion between the 6mm and 243, the 6mm is more accurate than any 243 I have ever shot.
Sniper151 is offline  
Old 05-28-2005, 08:48 PM
  #12  
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,474
Default RE: .243 vs 6mm remington

Mine were more accurate than my 243's but both are usually quite accurate.
James B is offline  
Old 05-29-2005, 01:43 AM
  #13  
Fork Horn
 
jdreddish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 369
Default RE: .243 vs 6mm remington

having owned both, I will give a VERY SLIGHT edge to the 6mm. In terms of avalibility in factory loads, .243 all the way. It's like compairing a Ferrari to a Lamborghini.
jdreddish is offline  
Old 05-29-2005, 09:34 AM
  #14  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: .243 vs 6mm remington

1/4" in OAL is the physical difference. I have only owned one a 1966 700 ADL might have been the most accurate rifle I have ever owned. A good friend in PA owns a slightly newer model and it is deadly accurate as well
oldelkhunter is offline  
Old 05-29-2005, 10:19 AM
  #15  
Nontypical Buck
 
idahoelkinstructor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 2,555
Default RE: .243 vs 6mm remington

All I can say it that I sure want a 6mm in a left hand bolt action with a 26" tube!
idahoelkinstructor is offline  
Old 05-29-2005, 10:55 AM
  #16  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bossier City LA United States
Posts: 2,425
Default RE: .243 vs 6mm remington

Now everyone should know by now that the 243 Win is the undisputed king of cartridges. If you don't believe me just ask zrexpilot.
frizzellr is offline  
Old 05-29-2005, 12:11 PM
  #17  
 
Roskoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,127
Default RE: .243 vs 6mm remington

My pet caliber is a 6MM-284; which is a .284 Winchester necked down to .243. Easy to rechamber a .243 or a 6MM Remington - but it needs a 26" barrel to get the full performance level. 100 grain bullets can be propelled to almost 3500 fps safely, and 70 grain Nosler Ballistic Tips can reach almost 4,000. Barrel life is around 1,200 rounds. This a caliber with a very high level of long term customer satisfaction - at least out here in the west where shots can be on the long side. FWIW. Roskoe
Roskoe is offline  
Old 05-29-2005, 01:54 PM
  #18  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default RE: .243 vs 6mm remington

ORIGINAL: frizzellr

Now everyone should know by now that the 243 Win is the undisputed king of cartridges. If you don't believe me just ask zrexpilot.
Finally sinking in huh ?
Got me a small hog yesterday with my .22 hornet. didnt run an inch with a shot to the body. Funny it was quartering to me and entered exited and entered again hiting the spine on the third hole. Weird.......
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 05-29-2005, 04:44 PM
  #19  
Giant Nontypical
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default RE: .243 vs 6mm remington

If you handload, its a toss up! If you are going to be using regular ammo, 6MM are not really hard to find, but you will have a much better selection with the .243! I would not hesitate to own a 6MM again!
With good 100 gr. bullets the .243/6MM, is my minimum for deer, but a very good minimum for any Whitetail!
JagMagMan is offline  
Old 05-29-2005, 07:44 PM
  #20  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Western PA
Posts: 1,356
Default RE: .243 vs 6mm remington

i have owned both the 243 and 6mm which i currently do own. I have to give teh edge to the 6mm that extra 100-200fps diff makes a lil bit of a difference on long range shots. As far as actual on game damage and preformance i cant really see a difference. My 6mm is by far more accurate than my 243. the 243 with handloads would shoot inch groups my 6mm off the bench with my handloads will cut holes at 100yds as long as i do my part. I'm fairly partial of my 6mm i dont think im gona put it down here anytime soon, though i would not hesitate buying a 243 sometime. To each his own.
deerslayer223 is offline  


Quick Reply: .243 vs 6mm remington


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.