Any thoughts on the "NEW" 6.8mm SPC by remington?
#11
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bossier City LA United States
Posts: 2,425
RE: Any thoughts on the "NEW" 6.8mm SPC by remington?
I was really surprised to see the armed forces considering a new cartridge to replace their beloved 5.56......
#12
RE: Any thoughts on the "NEW" 6.8mm SPC by remington?
I wish they would stop screwing around with the mouse gun and now the rat gun and switch to a FN FAL/G3 platform like they should have in the first place instead of the AR crapola.
#13
Fork Horn
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: southwest ohio USA
Posts: 111
RE: Any thoughts on the "NEW" 6.8mm SPC by remington?
My brother in law completed basic a year ago and is about to come home from his first Iraq tour. He was told in the basic, that the 223 is junk and an unreliable man stopper, by his Drill Instructor towards the class.
#14
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,290
RE: Any thoughts on the "NEW" 6.8mm SPC by remington?
Sounds like the DI thought out loud. Not the best for new troopies to hear. They have to work with what they have.
The M16. Fastest shooting squirrel rifle ever issued to a standing army.
The M16. Fastest shooting squirrel rifle ever issued to a standing army.
#16
Fork Horn
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 280
RE: Any thoughts on the "NEW" 6.8mm SPC by remington?
@#$%@#%, some of you boys are hard on the old M-16. Just watched "Tales of the Gun" on the History Channel last week and part of it was about the development of the M-16. The M-14 was replaced because it was heavy and totally uncontrollable in automatic fire with all but the most highly trained riflemen. A soldier could carry almost 3 times the amount of ammo for an M-16 compared to an M-14.
As for the smaller caliber, the M-16 was revolutionary because of the Army's previous obsession with large caliber, long-range weapons. After studying the issue, the large majority of soldiers didn't engage targets until well under 200 yards, so there was no widespread need for a standard issue rifle to have the capability of shooting 200+ yards with accuarcy and "man-stopping" capability.
That's what I can remember from the episode. I think the old DI must have been hittin' the "sauce" that morning.
P.S. I read somewhere that the 6.8 was not going to be a standard issue round. As the SPC indicates, it's planned to be used for "special purposes" (long-range sniping?, special forces).
As for the smaller caliber, the M-16 was revolutionary because of the Army's previous obsession with large caliber, long-range weapons. After studying the issue, the large majority of soldiers didn't engage targets until well under 200 yards, so there was no widespread need for a standard issue rifle to have the capability of shooting 200+ yards with accuarcy and "man-stopping" capability.
That's what I can remember from the episode. I think the old DI must have been hittin' the "sauce" that morning.
P.S. I read somewhere that the 6.8 was not going to be a standard issue round. As the SPC indicates, it's planned to be used for "special purposes" (long-range sniping?, special forces).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2006HighSierra
Guns
41
06-25-2007 09:53 PM