Community
Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

.260 Rem vs 7mm-08

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-28-2004, 11:14 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 14
Default .260 Rem vs 7mm-08

I am looking for a low recoil short action (non-magnum!) deer rifle that I wouldn't feel bad shooting at a Mule deer from 250+/- yards. These two are interesting.

Any thoughts?


P.S. Why hasn't anyone put a .277 bullet in that .308 case?
kraftworks3 is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 08:38 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 207
Default RE: .260 Rem vs 7mm-08

If you handload you can work up a light load for a .270 and that might fit your needs.
speedgator is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 06:06 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 776
Default RE: .260 Rem vs 7mm-08

.277" bullet in 308Win. case? Probably hasn't been done (as a factory round) because they know it can't compete with the 270Win. Until very recently the only other 270 cartridge was the 270 Weatherby Mag. Then too, we've had the 7mm-08 with us now for
over/about 25yrs.

".....a low recoil short action (non-magnum!) deer rifle that I wouldn't feel bad shooting at a Mule deer from 250+/- yards. ....."
The 260 Rem. and the 7mm-08 will both do the job on mule deer. My personal pick however, is the 308Win. I used one in Wyoming for near 7yrs., and it always did an
excellent job. But, as noted, the 260 or 7mm-08, either one will serve you well for mule deer.
Virginia7 is offline  
Old 12-31-2004, 06:48 PM
  #4  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: missouri
Posts: 305
Default RE: .260 Rem vs 7mm-08

i prefer the 7mm-08 if nothing for bullet selection. but i have not read anything bad about the 260
chma is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 01:28 PM
  #5  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SE Wisc
Posts: 677
Default RE: .260 Rem vs 7mm-08

7mm-08 is my opinion. You can get ammo for it at wal-mart. the 260 may be a little harder to find.
semi is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 01:47 PM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
BareBack Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Moccasin, Montana
Posts: 1,835
Default RE: .260 Rem vs 7mm-08

I like the 7mm-08 for deer,but I wish there were more factory loads for it stead of 140 gr.I would like to see a 160 gr bullet and a 120 gr nosler.Anyone with me on this.
BBJ
BareBack Jack is offline  
Old 01-06-2005, 02:03 PM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Baileysville, WV
Posts: 2,925
Default RE: .260 Rem vs 7mm-08

Heck yeah...120 Nosler I would buy on sight!
Doe Dumper is offline  
Old 01-06-2005, 03:05 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 776
Default RE: .260 Rem vs 7mm-08

I like the 7mm-08 for deer,but I wish there were more factory loads for it stead of 140 gr.I would like to see a 160 gr bullet and a 120 gr nosler.Anyone with me on this.
Yep, count me in. A good 160gr. load, maybe Nosler Partition or Trophy Bonded, would
make the 7mm-08 a good/better elk/moose cartridge. 120gr. HP or 115gr. HP loads
would help too, for varmint work.
Virginia7 is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 08:58 PM
  #9  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: freeport fl
Posts: 179
Default RE: .260 Rem vs 7mm-08

7mm08 is becoming one of the favorite deer loads in the south
Borty77 is offline  
Old 01-08-2005, 04:48 AM
  #10  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: roulette,pa usa
Posts: 349
Default RE: .260 Rem vs 7mm-08

Both of these cartridges will work fine for deer at that range.I use the 260 with 129gr hornady sp .
sam 444 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.