Community
Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

Anyone have a .204 yet?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-27-2004, 12:20 PM
  #11  
Typical Buck
 
Big Guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southampton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 974
Default RE: Anyone have a .204 yet?

The .223 is based on the mostly defunct .222 Mag brass.
Big Guy01 is offline  
Old 02-28-2004, 10:18 PM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 127
Default RE: Anyone have a .204 yet?

I read a magazine ad for it, that's it. I agree, sounds like a something that we don't reallyl need, but yet will have to have. IMHO we have many rounds like that. Take the .17HMR, and .500S&W for instance.
icthruu is offline  
Old 03-01-2004, 04:57 PM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
Posts: 12
Default RE: Anyone have a .204 yet?

If you're a fox/coyote drive hunter you know that Heaven has always been somewhere between the .17rem & .220swift.

Besides being fast, flat, no recoil, accurate and explosive killer, the .17 has offers 2 advantages:

a) NOISE: when hunting on someone else's land (who also has neighbors) the .17 is much quieter than the .22 centerfires.

b) SAFETY: the .17 bullet won't ricochet like the heavier .22 centerfires cause there's usually nothing left of it on impact.

.204 is just a little beefier .17rem. I doubt the bullets will ricochet and it'll carry itself better when working with a breeze. Definately has a niche.
shootsbull is offline  
Old 03-01-2004, 06:49 PM
  #14  
Nontypical Buck
 
driftrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Coralville, IA. USA
Posts: 3,802
Default RE: Anyone have a .204 yet?

I've never witnessed a ricochet with my 22-250 when shooting polymer tipped varmint bullets. They seem to disintegrate pretty fast when striking the dirt at 3000+ fps. That's not to say that it couldn't happen, all the more reason to be assured of your target and the backdrop. But I think that as long as it hits something solid there won't be much left. I'd be the most nervous about coyote hunters that choose to use FMJ or controlled expansion type bullets on coyotes to help lessen the pelt damage. Those will ricochet. Not to condemn those that do, but just to illustrate how important safety is and how ammo selection effects that.

Mike
driftrider is offline  
Old 03-03-2004, 05:46 AM
  #15  
Spike
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SHEPHERD MI USA
Posts: 55
Default RE: Anyone have a .204 yet?

Just read an article in Shooting Magazine. Looks like the .204 will be a hot commodity on the varmiters market. At 4225fps, it is defineitely getting out there. The round is supposed to only penetrate a small way then come apart,thus leaving no exit hole......a fur harvestors dream. For a small round the ballistics were incredible. Not what I expected. Time will tell.
patches42 is offline  
Old 03-05-2004, 04:09 PM
  #16  
Nontypical Buck
 
Ruger-Redhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,918
Default RE: Anyone have a .204 yet?

For those interested,I received my daily Ruger wishlist from Gunsamerica today.Apparently the 204 Rugers have been released.One guy has a Ruger #1 in the 204 Ruger.He appears to be proud of it.995.00.Unless you have to be the first one on the block to own one,wait and you'll find them cheaper then 1 grand.

Ruger Redhawk
Ruger-Redhawk is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.