Leupold Rifleman
#4
RE: Leupold Rifleman
The rifleman is no where good enough to cost $200 that most places want for a 3-9X. IMHO it should cost about $79.99.
Look at just about any other scope in the same price range and nearly all of them will be better optically as well as in construction.
Look at just about any other scope in the same price range and nearly all of them will be better optically as well as in construction.
#5
RE: Leupold Rifleman
I have a couple of the Rifleman and also the VX- l. Try as I might, I can't find a thing wrong with them. The VX-l has a little better optical quality but both are good rugged scopes. Look through one in the stores and take it outside and check it out. I think they make these lesser priced scopes because they want a piece of that market. Can you find a better scope? Most Likely. Will you get your monies worth from the Rifleman? I did.
#6
RE: Leupold Rifleman
Why anyone would pay the same for a non-one piece scope without fully multicoated optics when you can pay the same amount of money for a Burris Sightron or Bushnell that has these features just so they can say "I have a Leupold" makes no sense to me.
#10
RE: Leupold Rifleman
ORIGINAL: Vapodog
I wonder if it was designed to sell at Wall-Mart...
I wonder if it was designed to sell at Wall-Mart...
James its your $ if you want to spend the same on an inferior product thats your choice. Has nothing to do with being smarter or not. Maybe what I think is common sense-- isnt-- we can argue that on way or the other.
You can't argue that these scopes have less features for more $ though,---- its a fact.