AcuDraw vs. AcuDraw50?
08-27-2008, 08:05 AM
#2
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: No.MN
Posts: 1,053
RE: AcuDraw vs. AcuDraw50?
Depends on you. How much help do you need cocking the bow? Some to none, the 50 will work fine. I can cock my 200 lb bow, with a twice-cut back, using a rope cocker just fine...just not all day long. Cocking the 175 on the other hand is a snap.
08-27-2008, 04:05 PM
#3
Fork Horn
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 159
RE: AcuDraw vs. AcuDraw50?
I don't need help cocking my bow because of an injury or ailment so I use the ACUdraw 50 just for the consistent cock every time. It is a lot fast than the ACUdraw. Both are very good though.
08-31-2008, 04:19 PM
#4
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hayes, Va.
Posts: 2,332
RE: AcuDraw vs. AcuDraw50?
I like the Acudraw50. I do have bad shoulders andhad operations that left them weak.
The crank system is nice, but too slow. I have the GT-Curve and it has a 180# draw and the Acudraw50 cuts that in half. I really don't have any problems cocking it.
The crank system is nice, but too slow. I have the GT-Curve and it has a 180# draw and the Acudraw50 cuts that in half. I really don't have any problems cocking it.
X2
09-27-2008, 06:59 PM
#7
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 478
RE: AcuDraw vs. AcuDraw50?
Basicly if you do not need the crank I generaly dont recomend it. It is nice in a stand, but generaly you dont really get that second shot, and it is $100 extra for the crank. That is a bunch of extra arrows and some broadheads for that money if you dont need the crank
Wyvern
Wyvern
