Mathews Q2 vs Hoyt Cybertec
#1
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Elk River, MN USA
Posts: 190
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Currently own an MQ1. Ready to upgrade. Talked with local Hoyt dealer who said the Cybertec would be most similiar to a Q2. He said the Cybertec would be considerably quicker than my MQ1. I am more interested in stability than short bow so am looking at longer bow.
Currently shooting 247fps with OD, 57lbs 29" draw length, Gold tips/100grain.
How does the Cybertec compare to the Q2. Why would you recommend one over the other based upon testing or experience?
Price seems to be similar. Thanks.
Currently shooting 247fps with OD, 57lbs 29" draw length, Gold tips/100grain.
How does the Cybertec compare to the Q2. Why would you recommend one over the other based upon testing or experience?
Price seems to be similar. Thanks.
#2
Fork Horn
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Stoughton Wisconsin USA
Posts: 198
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just got done making a very similar decision! I shot the Q2 and a Cybertec one after the other. The Q2 had a bit less recoil than the cybertec but not by much, the cybertec is lighter, I liked the cybertecs grip and overall feel better. The cybertec was faster. I shot the Q2 at 29"draw, set at 62#, and a arrow that weighed 345g at 265fps. I didnt shoot the cybertec thru the chrono, but did shoot a Havoctec thru and the cyber is a few fps faster than a havoctec, anyhow...the havoctec at 29", 59#, same arrow as used with Q2 shot at 273fps. Bottom line...I ordered the Cybertec, for me it was the nicer bow overall!
#3
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Elk River, MN USA
Posts: 190
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Bloodtrail1:
Thanks. I read your email on the Q2 vs Hypertec. So the Hypertec was set 3 lbs lighter that the Q2 and was faster.
Are there additional SVL you can add to reduce additional recoil to the Hoyt. Can I assume the recoil was insufficent for your decision? I really like my Mathews, but will switch if there is better technology. Weren't you comparing a 2002 Hoyt versus a 2001 Mathews?
Thanks. I read your email on the Q2 vs Hypertec. So the Hypertec was set 3 lbs lighter that the Q2 and was faster.
Are there additional SVL you can add to reduce additional recoil to the Hoyt. Can I assume the recoil was insufficent for your decision? I really like my Mathews, but will switch if there is better technology. Weren't you comparing a 2002 Hoyt versus a 2001 Mathews?
#4
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In the real world a small difference in speed shouldn't be a factor. But then again there are some speed freaks out there. Personally I would just shoot each bow as much as you can and see which one feels more natural to your shooting style. That is the best suggestion that I can give without saying get a Mathews.<img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
My Updated Page with Colorado 2001 Trip-
www.geocities.com/hfpmad
![](http://www.hunting-pictures.com/members/IL_Bow_Man/ilbowman2.gif)
![](http://bestanimations.com/Flags/USA/USA-08.gif)
My Updated Page with Colorado 2001 Trip-
www.geocities.com/hfpmad
#5
Fork Horn
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Stoughton Wisconsin USA
Posts: 198
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
dhacker: Yes the Havoctec was set 3# lighter on the draw weight than the Q2 and was faster as I said. And the IBO speed on a Cybertec I beleive is 4-5fps faster than a Havoctec. The SLIGHT recoil diff. between the Cybertec and Q2 was minimal. The Q2 was a tad better on that. But for me the overall feel was just better with the Hoyt. I used to own a MQ-1 and I really cant say bad about it, but the new 2002 Hoyts feel/shoot nicer to me than the 2001 Mathews. I also own a Parker 31, which is my #1 bow! That is why I sold my MQ-1! If your looking for a short axle bow, try a Parker Ultra-lite 31!! But...try to shoot a Q2 and a Hoyt Cybertec and see which works best for you!
#8
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: woodbine KY USA
Posts: 315
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not bad. I expected it to be in the upper 600. My local shop wants $600 for the havoctec. I dont know which to get. The cybertec looks and feels so well balanced. I just dont know if the shorter brace height will affect my shot though.
#9
Fork Horn
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Stoughton Wisconsin USA
Posts: 198
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thats why I decided to go with the cybertec v. havoctec, I liked the havoctec, but once I shot the cybertec I liked it better. It has less recoil and is better balanced in my hand as compared to havoctec. I never gave the brace height diff. a thought, as I really dont think it will be a problem. Cant wait to get the bow! Probably wont be in until next week sometime??