Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Carbon vs Aluminum

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-01-2004, 08:18 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 90
Default Carbon vs Aluminum

What is the advantange of shooting carbon arrows over aluminum?

phantombuck is offline  
Old 09-01-2004, 08:29 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Erie, Pa
Posts: 177
Default RE: Carbon vs Aluminum

Carbons wont bend like aluminums. I also hate the sound of aluminium when you draw back on most rests.
reflexkid is offline  
Old 09-01-2004, 10:17 PM
  #3  
 
MO_Bowhnter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eureka, MO
Posts: 3,703
Default RE: Carbon vs Aluminum

Carbon is lighter and they shoot a little flatter. Plus they are tougher and more durable, especially if you shoot goldtips
MO_Bowhnter is offline  
Old 09-02-2004, 12:07 AM
  #4  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 580
Default RE: Carbon vs Aluminum

There are many pros and cons for both try them both with your set up and choose what works best for you
lou-lou is offline  
Old 09-02-2004, 03:10 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 220
Default RE: Carbon vs Aluminum

yep i like carbon no bending and they do shoot flatter.
sneekky is offline  
Old 09-02-2004, 07:07 AM
  #6  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,175
Default RE: Carbon vs Aluminum

Carbons won't bend like aluminum. On the other hand, they'll warp when they lose their memory. Some are worse than others but it eventually happens to all of them. However, since they don't bend, you can't straighten them back out. A warped carbon is trash. Don't believe that worn out fairy tale, "carbons are either straight or they're broken." It's not true.

Aluminums will bend, but they can usually be straightened.

Carbons cover a wider spine range than aluminum. It's easier to select the correct size arrow when each shaft covers a 20 pound range in spine rather than a 5 pound range.

Carbons have a smaller diameter than aluminum, which theoretically gives them a slight advantage when it comes to penetration in game. On the other hand, the smaller diameter makes it more difficult to achieve adequate fletching clearance. So, many folks have given up and gone to dropaway rests to eliminate clearance problems, OR they've surrendered to the inevitable and have gone to 100% contact with rests like the Whisker Bisquit.

Carbons are much more durable than aluminums of comparable weight and spine. As you get into the heavier and slower aluminum arrows, that advantage becomes lessened. In most instances, a carbon will shrug off a hit that will crater a 2213. A hit that will ruin a 2216 will probably also ruin a carbon arrow.

Aluminums are much more consistent in spine, weight and inside diameter than carbons. As such, they are much easier to set up and tune with fixed blade broadheads. In my experience, they are measureably more accurate than carbon arrows, across the board. Also, since aluminums cover a narrower spine range, I think that you can match spine on aluminum arrows to your bow much more precisely than you can match carbon arrows. Which, IMO, is another point that makes them easier to tune and more accurate than carbons.

I like, and use, the heavier aluminum arrows. Since I limit my hunting shots to 30 yards and under, I don't need a super flat trajectory. I need to be able to count on getting 12 arrows out of a dozen that will shoot broadheads accurately and consistently. I'd much rather have that than to be able to brag about how fast my bow shoots, but only get one or two arrows out of a dozen that will reliably shoot broadheads.

Frankly, I'm too picky about the quality of my hunting arrows to be able to use carbon. I have to use aluminum because they are the ONLY arrows that fully live up to my expectations without raping my wallet.

Only one carbon arrow meets my requirements, and even it has an aluminum core. If money were no object, I'd use nothing but ACC's.
Arthur P is offline  
Old 09-02-2004, 07:23 AM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
ijimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WEST PALM FLORIDA
Posts: 2,890
Default RE: Carbon vs Aluminum

What is the advantange of shooting carbon arrows over aluminum?
NONE ,That is unless they have both , such as acc's , or beman matrix . I have used several manufactures of carbon shafts , none have been even close to the consistancy of alluminum , not close at all . The best carbons I ever used were ,carbon express teriminators , and they lost their spine after about 200-300 shots . Ive never had an alluminum lose its spine that I could tell , they will group after years of use .
ijimmy is offline  
Old 09-02-2004, 10:38 AM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fairfield Ohio USA
Posts: 341
Default RE: Carbon vs Aluminum

I like the durability of carbons. They also, IMO, have a better "feel" than aluminum. They also shot flatter, as mentioned in other posts, than aluminums.
dough boy is offline  
Old 09-02-2004, 10:50 AM
  #9  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8,135
Default RE: Carbon vs Aluminum

Wow.... Everyone needs to go back and re-read Arthur P's reply post. That was excellent!

Why do I stick with Easton XX75 #2315's? They are cheap in price and fly perfectly straight out of my old dual cam PSE bow. If I bend one, big deal... I'll use it for a tomato stake or bean pole stake in my garden next year.

When the bow shop setup my old PSE bow, they set the prongs of the TM Hunter rest and arrow nock point to be perfectly aligned when using a 2315 arrow. I wouldn't know how to change my bow setup to be able to use carbons anyway. My bow still shoots great and perfectly accurate, so I don't mess with it.

Butch A.
ButchA is offline  
Old 09-02-2004, 10:56 AM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 86
Default RE: Carbon vs Aluminum

Bravo, arthur p great explaintion.....
I will add not all carbons are light and agree with heavier arrow (cx hunters @ 10.5 gpi)
Some af acc by Easton are heaveir yet. I shoot what ever I have in hand preffer carbons
but can shoot aluminum if I run out of arrows on a 3d course. What I am thinking here a what fails to said if you want or need that air scoarching speed ussaully carbons are the way to go. But if you are keeping things to a "normal" speed say to 250 fps tops.
Nothing is that finicky from arrow, bow tune and body form. Once that is pushed all sorts of little things happen to make that group larger.
Carbons have grown up but they are perfected and aluminums are the old man here, tried and true.
good luck......
DaBoys is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
edelsite
Technical
21
04-21-2009 06:39 AM
bdbwtie101
Bowhunting Gear Review
7
12-01-2005 07:15 PM
jbrodie7
Bowhunting
10
02-08-2004 02:56 PM
bronko22000
Bowhunting
2
01-28-2004 09:24 PM
billw3fan
Technical
13
09-12-2002 12:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Carbon vs Aluminum


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.