Jollyarcher

I agree with Joe... not to mention that the Tritium style sights are known to be expensive by comparison. Speaking from firearm offerings that is. I've not used a peep for years and still can shoot as good as anyone who does. The string method Joe mentioned works well, as do other variants for peep removal. The "No peep" is widely accepted. The benefits of loosing the peep are immediately apparent, especially in low light, but you need to have a solid / repeatable anchor with good form to shoot well without one. I'd eradicate that front to back sight and give peepless a try. After all, practicing new techniques with your bow is fun too!

Deleted User

[Deleted by Admins]

davidmil

NO.... it's a physics thing. Obviously, you have some sort of stock or ownership or relationship or work for these people. You appear out of the blue and make your first post as a resounding endorsement to that which has been POO POOed by the EXPERTS of the industry and the top shooters. Not to mention it goes against everything we learned in science classes for the past few hundred years.

Deleted User

[Deleted by Admins]