Someone said...scent lok
05-24-2010, 06:06 PM
#1
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: central and east texas
Posts: 4,894
Someone said...scent lok
well i saw a post bout gettin back cash for your scent lok clothes ya bought cause something bout re-activating it aint possible...er something...so i followed the link, and this is what my result so far is.
Thank you for contacting us about the recent Scent Lok decision. Contrary to some posts on internet forums, getting a refund or some other amount of money back (such as the extra amount you paid for Scent Lok over the cost of the same garment without Scent Lok) is not as simple as just contacting us.
In the Minnesota case, the Court did not certify a class of Minnesota purchasers of Scent Lok clothing. So, the only way we can seek a refund for Minnesota hunters is if they hire us to represent them. As we have done with other hunters, if we decide to represent you, we would do so on a contingent basis, meaning that we will only get paid if we prevail.
Proposed class action cases are pending for hunters in California, Florida, Wisconsin, Illinois, Maryland, Indiana, New York and Michigan. We will be moving the Court on July 2, 2010 for certification of classes of hunters in those states. If you live in one of these states and would like to join these cases, please let me know.
If you would like us to represent you, either individually or a class representative for hunters in your state, please fill out this questionnaire. Then, we will give you a call to discuss.
The Court has only issued an Order on the question of whether the products can eliminate odor. Many of you have asked whether the product can reduce odor, and, if so, how much. In the coming weeks, we will be posting on our website (heinsmills.com/scent-lok.html) information about this question and the question of how much the product can be reactivated.
Much of the information in the lawsuit has been designated as “confidential” by defendants. We intend to ask the Court to unseal the scientific testing.
Thank you for contacting us about the recent Scent Lok decision. Contrary to some posts on internet forums, getting a refund or some other amount of money back (such as the extra amount you paid for Scent Lok over the cost of the same garment without Scent Lok) is not as simple as just contacting us.
In the Minnesota case, the Court did not certify a class of Minnesota purchasers of Scent Lok clothing. So, the only way we can seek a refund for Minnesota hunters is if they hire us to represent them. As we have done with other hunters, if we decide to represent you, we would do so on a contingent basis, meaning that we will only get paid if we prevail.
Proposed class action cases are pending for hunters in California, Florida, Wisconsin, Illinois, Maryland, Indiana, New York and Michigan. We will be moving the Court on July 2, 2010 for certification of classes of hunters in those states. If you live in one of these states and would like to join these cases, please let me know.
If you would like us to represent you, either individually or a class representative for hunters in your state, please fill out this questionnaire. Then, we will give you a call to discuss.
The Court has only issued an Order on the question of whether the products can eliminate odor. Many of you have asked whether the product can reduce odor, and, if so, how much. In the coming weeks, we will be posting on our website (heinsmills.com/scent-lok.html) information about this question and the question of how much the product can be reactivated.
Much of the information in the lawsuit has been designated as “confidential” by defendants. We intend to ask the Court to unseal the scientific testing.
