Would you??
#54
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 1,161
RE: Would you??
Ya know, you have to wonder sometimes how many guys on here are posting stuff under the influence. Not eluding to anything with you specifically Greg, just occured to me. I understand full well where you were going with this. People always want something for nothing, the path of least resistence, would they take this route? Honestly, and obviously, you couldn't keep the shelves stocked.
What's the saying? Great minds think alike? Oh crap, that can apply to boneheads as well.
Seriously, I thought about that but with infrared so I can spot and stalk without the spotting part.
ORIGINAL: LittleChief
Personally, I'm holding out for a GPS unit with constant access to network of satellites in geo-synchronous orbit that transmit real time thermal imaging of my location with the ability to zoom into a point that will allow you to detect antler size and will also zoom out toshow a 5 square mile image for determining deer population or concentration in a given area.[8D] (It's probably do-able now.)
ORIGINAL: IAhuntr
When is technology going too far?
When is technology going too far?
Seriously, I thought about that but with infrared so I can spot and stalk without the spotting part.
#58
RE: Would you??
Wouldn't be my cup of tea. I thinkalot of us bowhunt for the challenge of getting close, that would take away from it big time. I agree with you Greg, that would be a major downfall for hunting in general. Plus, who wants 15 pairs of highly sensative eyes around when you are trying to draw your bow.....not me. Intersesting post.
Shane
Shane
#60
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: IOWA/25' UP
Posts: 7,145
RE: Would you??
ORIGINAL: LittleChief
Didn't work for you either, huh Don???
ORIGINAL: hardcorehunter
That is like comparing a certain cologne that one would wear and all girls would attack you.
That is like comparing a certain cologne that one would wear and all girls would attack you.