Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

What's wrong with this POV?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-11-2008, 08:05 AM
  #91  
Giant Nontypical
 
PreacherTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
Posts: 6,679
Default RE: What's wrong with this POV?

ORIGINAL: gutshot

Jeff you have analyzed the crap out of this one.
that is SO unlike him .....[8D]
PreacherTony is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:06 AM
  #92  
Dominant Buck
Thread Starter
 
GMMAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 21,043
Default RE: What's wrong with this POV?

If that's the case. gutshot....it's my issue, then.

When the author talks about "all things being equal"......"I" simply assumed he meant the same bow.

Again.....MY issue.
GMMAT is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:07 AM
  #93  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Elkview WV
Posts: 2,369
Default RE: What's wrong with this POV?

And issues are things that you have plenty of.
gutshot is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:07 AM
  #94  
Giant Nontypical
 
quiksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,716
Default RE: What's wrong with this POV?

As has always been the case with archery - fads make the bowhunting world turn. The newest fad is the return to heavy arrows, feathers, trad bows, etc... Faster was always better - at least until we got to the point where most manufacturers can't make them go any faster. Now that they've topped out the speed game - heavier is magically better (again).

Everybody who has ever shot a deeris a self-proclaimed "expert" in this field. Why, you ask? Because they have the results to prove it. They have a bloody arrow weighing ________ grains, and a deer carcass that's a testament to their arrow's lethality.


Same As Others

Theproblem here, is that a lot of the opinions being floated on this subjectare largely uninformed as to the polar extremes.The self-proclaimed "authorities on the subject"have never visited the land that is two standard deviations from the mean. If you've never fired a 200-grain arrow into a deer... Or never even fired a 200 grain arrow(period) - do you really have any real-world knowledge to draw upon? Can you REALLY tell us what will happen? Is there an agenda?Is it mere speculation?

I'd argue the latter.

Last year, when I told you guys that I was hunting deer with a 5.5 gpi arrow at sub-300 grains, and approaching 400 feet per second - you'd have thought the world was ending. Well, we all know how that story ended. I set out to prove a point, and I did it.

The point here is - pay no attention to the bell curve.

Manufacturers are always angling, both explicitly and implicitly - through their advertising, through their people - to shuffle people into the hump of the curve, which is where THEY like to live and dominate. The more narrow the curve, the easier it is to target their demographics andmax out theirsales numbers. Narrowing the bell curve allows manufacturers to focus their sales with a smaller product basket, which gives them a better economy of scale, and enormous profit margins. Furthermore - certain products (like heavy arrows) give them less headaches from a warranty/liability standpoint. Don't think for one second that they do what they do with your best interests in mind. It's all about assets and liabilities. Whether you believe it or not, to them, you are nothing more than an outstandingliability.

Even when you see the appearance of "impartiality," perhaps in the context of a magazine article (like the one Jeff referenced)- reader beware. Most authors are very well-connected in the archery world, and have (or want to have) their hands in a lot of different pockets. There's always an agenda being pushed, or a back being scratched. Believe it.


It's all about the Benjamins, baby.

Falling into the bell curve, however, does nothing for you - the consumer. It just means that you're doing what they want you to do. You are making their life easier.

Let's pretend for one second that you decide to be your own dog and stray from the pack. What happens then? Well, the more elongated the bell curve (as more peopledeviate from the average),the WIDER range of products that must be available to accommodate an increasing demand for a wider variety of products (heavy AND light arrows). It's HARDER and less profitable to be a seller, but the buyer is given more latitude to deviate from the "same as others" category. Manufacturers are forced to innovate, increase tolerances, and make better products. You force their hand.

The King's message for today: Life as a consumer is a constant battle - and everybody has an agenda. You just can't lose sight of the forest for the trees, and NEVER be afraid to deviate from the mean. You do the rest of the world a favor everytime you do.



quiksilver is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:13 AM
  #95  
Giant Nontypical
 
PreacherTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
Posts: 6,679
Default RE: What's wrong with this POV?

ORIGINAL: quiksilver

As has always been the case with archery - fads make the bowhunting world turn. The newest fad is the return to heavy arrows, feathers, trad bows, etc... Faster was always better - at least until we got to the point where most manufacturers can't make them go any faster. Now that they've topped out the speed game - heavier is magically better (again).

Everybody who has ever shot a deeris a self-proclaimed "expert" in this field. Why, you ask? Because they have the results to prove it. They have a bloody arrow weighing ________ grains, and a deer carcass that's a testament to their arrow's lethality.


Same As Others

Theproblem here, is that a lot of the opinions being floated on this subjectare largely uninformed as to the polar extremes.The self-proclaimed "authorities on the subject"have never visited the land that is two standard deviations from the mean. If you've never fired a 200-grain arrow into a deer... Or never even fired a 200 grain arrow(period) - do you really have any real-world knowledge to draw upon? Can you REALLY tell us what will happen? Is there an agenda?Is it mere speculation?

I'd argue the latter.

Last year, when I told you guys that I was hunting deer with a 5.5 gpi arrow at sub-300 grains, and approaching 400 feet per second - you'd have thought the world was ending. Well, we all know how that story ended. I set out to prove a point, and I did it.

The point here is - pay no attention to the bell curve.

Manufacturers are always angling, both explicitly and implicitly - through their advertising, through their people - to shuffle people into the hump of the curve, which is where THEY like to live and dominate. The more narrow the curve, the easier it is to target their demographics andmax out theirsales numbers. Narrowing the bell curve allows manufacturers to focus their sales with a smaller product basket, which gives them a better economy of scale, and enormous profit margins. Furthermore - certain products (like heavy arrows) give them less headaches from a warranty/liability standpoint. Don't think for one second that they do what they do with your best interests in mind. It's all about assets and liabilities. You, whether you believe it or not - are a liability.


It's all about the Benjamins, baby.

Falling into the bell curve, however, does nothing for you - the consumer. It just means that you're doing what they want you to do. You are making their life easier.

Let's pretend for one second that you decide to be your own dog and stray from the pack. What happens then? Well, the more elongated the bell curve (as more peopledeviate from the average),the WIDER range of products that must be available to accommodate an increasing demand for a wider variety of products (heavy AND light arrows). It's HARDER and less profitable to be a seller, but the buyer is given more latitude to deviate from the "same as others" category. Manufacturers are forced to innovate, increase tolerances, and make better products. You force their hand.

The King's message for today: Life as a consumer is a constant battle - and everybody has an agenda. You just can't lose sight of the forest for the trees, and NEVER be afraid to deviate from the mean. You do the rest of the world a favor everytime you do.




hence the case for ....dare I say it ...... scent lok [8D]
PreacherTony is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:16 AM
  #96  
Dominant Buck
Thread Starter
 
GMMAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 21,043
Default RE: What's wrong with this POV?

Hey Fran.....

Do you see a day when mfr's tout "momentum produced" i.l.o. IBO speeds?

If so....how far are we from that point?

isn't that the ONLY way "they" can produce numbers to dispel your bow's "efficiency"?
GMMAT is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:19 AM
  #97  
Typical Buck
 
RuttNutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 546
Default RE: What's wrong with this POV?

ORIGINAL: PreacherTony

ORIGINAL: gutshot

Jeff you have analyzed the crap out of this one.
that is SO unlike him .....[8D]
+1

This is the worst thread in a while. Just another "whats wrong with this" Post from jeff. ...........Unbelivable...................
RuttNutt is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:21 AM
  #98  
Boone & Crockett
 
Germ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan/Ohio
Posts: 11,682
Default RE: What's wrong with this POV?

Theproblem here, is that a lot of the opinions being floated on this subjectare largely uninformed as to the polar extremes.The self-proclaimed "authorities on the subject"have never visited the land that is two standard deviations from the mean. If you've never fired a 200-grain arrow into a deer... Or never even fired a 200 grain arrow(period) - do you really have any real-world knowledge to draw upon? Can you REALLY tell us what will happen? Is there an agenda?Is it mere speculation?
Fran just for the record, I have no real-world knowledge of what cow poop taste like, but I am guessing, I would not like it

Eli Calaway(SP?) once said "You cannot argue with Physics"


Germ is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:21 AM
  #99  
Giant Nontypical
 
quiksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,716
Default RE: What's wrong with this POV?

I see the word "momentum" being floated a lot more often these days - depite nobody having a blessed clue what it is or how to calculate it. It's really kinda comical.

All I know is that the whole concept of "light arrows" scares the living **** out of the bow manufacturers.
quiksilver is offline  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:23 AM
  #100  
Boone & Crockett
 
Germ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan/Ohio
Posts: 11,682
Default RE: What's wrong with this POV?

http://www.alaskafrontierarchery.com/Articles.html

Germ is offline  


Quick Reply: What's wrong with this POV?


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.